Content-based image retrieval by matching hierarchical attributed region adjacency graphs

Content-based image retrieval requires a formal description of visual information. In medical applications, all relevant biological objects have to be represented by this description. Although color as the primary feature has proven successful in publicly available retrieval systems of general purpose, this description is not applicable to most medical images. Additionally, it has been shown that global features characterizing the whole image do not lead to acceptable results in the medical context or that they are only suitable for specific applications. For a general purpose content-based comparison of medical images, local, i.e. regional features that are collected on multiple scales must be used. A hierarchical attributed region adjacency graph (HARAG) provides such a representation and transfers image comparison to graph matching. However, building a HARAG from an image requires a restriction in size to be computationally feasible while at the same time all visually plausible information must be preserved. For this purpose, mechanisms for the reduction of the graph size are presented. Even with a reduced graph, the problem of graph matching remains NP-complete. In this paper, the Similarity Flooding approach and Hopfield-style neural networks are adapted from the graph matching community to the needs of HARAG comparison. Based on synthetic image material build from simple geometric objects, all visually similar regions were matched accordingly showing the framework's general applicability to content-based image retrieval of medical images.

[1]  Ralf Küsters,et al.  Computing Least Common Subsumers in Description Logics with Existential Restrictions , 1999, IJCAI.

[2]  Kristina Schädler,et al.  Comparing Structures Using a Hopfield-Style Neural Network , 1999, Applied Intelligence.

[3]  T M Lehmann,et al.  Content-based Image Retrieval in Medical Applications , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[4]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  An Image Understanding System Using Attributed Symbolic Representation and Inexact Graph-Matching , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Benoit Huet,et al.  Relational object recognition from large structural libraries , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching , 2002, Proceedings 18th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[7]  Euripides G. M. Petrakis,et al.  Fast Retrieval by Spatial Structure in Image Databases , 2002, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[8]  L. Rodney Long,et al.  Computer assisted retrieval of biomedical image features from spine X-rays: progress and prospects , 2001, Proceedings 14th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2001.

[9]  M. Nagao,et al.  Edge preserving smoothing , 1979 .

[10]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Blobworld: Image Segmentation Using Expectation-Maximization and Its Application to Image Querying , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Horst Bunke,et al.  A graph distance metric based on the maximal common subgraph , 1998, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[12]  Stan Sclaroff,et al.  Medical image segmentation and retrieval via deformable models , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[13]  Chi-Ren Shyu,et al.  Spatial lesion indexing for medical image databases using force histograms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[14]  Thomas Martin Deserno,et al.  Hierarchical feature clustering for content-based retrieval in medical image databases , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Tian-ge Zhuang,et al.  Medical image retrieval based on mutual correlation method , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  A Metric for Comparing Relational Descriptions , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.