A discussion of the acceptable risk problem

Abstract The petroleum activities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf are subject to regulations issued by the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. One important issue in these regulations is the use of acceptance criteria, and this paper discusses some philosophical aspects of acceptance criteria for risk, and the role of statistical decision theory within safety management. Statistical decision theory has been applied in several studies within the nuclear industry, but has not been fully adopted within the petroleum activity. The discussion concludes by listing important measures to manage the acceptable risk problem.

[1]  G. Aeppli,et al.  Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi , 1994 .

[2]  Terje Aven.  On safety management in the petroleum activities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf , 1994 .

[3]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[4]  S. R. Watson,et al.  The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis , 1994 .

[5]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[6]  J. K. Vaurio.  On the meaning of probability and frequency , 1990 .

[7]  Ross D. Shachter.  Evaluating Influence Diagrams , 1986, Oper. Res..

[8]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Francisco J. Samaniego.  Accelerated Life Testing and Experts' Opinions in Reliability , 1990 .

[10]  J. Vaurio.  Optimization of test and maintenance intervals based on risk and cost , 1995 .

[11]  T. Aven,et al.  Expressing and interpreting the results of quantitative risk analyses. Review and discussion , 1998 .

[12]  Jan Holmberg,et al.  Risk decision making in operational safety management: Experience from the Nordic benchmark study , 1994 .

[13]  J. Vatn.  Maintenance optimisation from a decision theoretical point of view , 1997 .

[14]  Thomas M. Murray,et al.  Comment on ‘The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis’ , 1995 .

[15]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[16]  Urban Kjellén,et al.  Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process Part I: A review of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods , 1995 .

[17]  E. Kreyszig.  Introductory Functional Analysis With Applications , 1978 .

[18]  Rommert Dekker.  On the use of operations research models for maintenance decision making , 1995 .

[19]  R L Keeney,et al.  A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  G. Ballard,et al.  Guest editorial: Societal risk—progress since Farmer , 1993 .

[21]  Per Hokstad,et al.  An overall model for maintenance optimization , 1996 .

[22]  Società italiana di fisica,et al.  Accelerated Life Testing and Experts' Opinion in Reliability , 1990 .

[23]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Managing Nuclear Waste from Power Plants , 1994 .

[24]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour , 1944 .

[25]  Yuan Hong,et al.  Conditional Influence Diagrams in Risk Management , 1993 .