Credit Risk Management in Banks: Hard Information, Soft Information and Manipulation

The role of information’s processing in bank intermediation is a crucial input. The bank has access to different types of information in order to manage risk through capital allocation for Value at Risk coverage. Hard information, contained in balance sheet data and produced with credit scoring, is quantitative and verifiable. Soft information, produced within a bank relationship, is qualitative and non verifiable, therefore manipulable, but produces more precise estimation of the debtor’s quality. In this article, we investigate the impact of the information’s type on credit risk management in a principalagent framework with moral hazard with hidden information. The results show that access to soft information allows the banker to decrease the capital allocation for VaR coverage. We also show the existence of an incentive of the credit officer to manipulate the signal based on soft information that he produces. Therefore, we propose to implement an adequate incentive salary package which unables this manipulation. The comparison of the results from the two frameworks (information hard versus combination of hard and soft information) using simulations confirms that soft information gives an advantage to the banker but requires particular organizational modifications within the bank, as it allows to reduce capital allocation for VaR coverage.

[1]  E. Fama,et al.  What's different about banks?☆ , 1985 .

[2]  O. Hart,et al.  Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Firms, contracts, and financial structure , 1995 .

[4]  Artur Raviv,et al.  The Capital Budgeting Process: Incentives and Information , 1996 .

[5]  Artur Raviv,et al.  Capital Budgeting and Delegation , 1997 .

[6]  Loretta J. Mester What's the point of credit scoring? , 1997 .

[7]  Jiang Luo,et al.  Capital Budgeting and Compensation with Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard , 2000 .

[8]  Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized vs. Hierarchical Firms , 2000 .

[9]  Arnoud Boot Relationship Banking: What Do We Know? , 2000 .

[10]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Does Function Follow Organizational Form? Evidence from the Lending Practices of Large and Small Banks , 2002 .

[11]  Leora F. Klapper,et al.  The Ability of Banks to Lend to Informationally Opaque Small Businesses , 2001 .

[12]  W. Scott Frame,et al.  The Effect of Credit Scoring on Small-Business Lending , 2001 .

[13]  Jon Danielsson,et al.  Incentives for effective risk management , 2002 .

[14]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending: The Importance of Bank Organisational Structure , 2001 .

[15]  Lars Norden,et al.  The Role of Non-Financial Factors on Internal Credit Ratings , 2002 .

[16]  Hendrik Hakenes,et al.  Banks as delegated risk managers , 2004 .

[17]  O. Ozbas,et al.  Integration, Organizational Processes and Allocation of Resources , 2005 .

[18]  B. Lehmann Is it Worth the While? The Relevance of Qualitative Information in Credit Rating , 2003 .

[19]  Equilibrium Incentives to Acquire Precise Information in Delegated Portfolio Management , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory F. Udell,et al.  The Past, Present, and Probable Future for Community Banks , 2004 .

[21]  Jonathan A. Scott Small Business and the Value of Community Financial Institutions , 2004 .

[22]  Christophe J. Godlewski,et al.  Gestion du Risque de Crédit dans la Banque: Information Hard, Information Soft et Manipulation , 2005 .

[23]  Michael T. Kirschenheiter Representational Faithfulness in Accounting: A Model of Hard Information , 2006 .