Quality of Learning on an MBA Programme: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance

This investigation: first, examines some psychometric properties of the scores obtained on a 30 item short form of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) using samples of postgraduate management (MBA) students (n=75); second, examines the relationship between scores on the three dimensions of the RASI and background variables of age, gender and prior educational experience; third, tests for any relationship between the background variables and academic performance as measured by four distinct types of assessment; and fourth, examines the relationship between scores on the three dimensions of the RASI and academic performance. No previous published work has examined the approaches to learning of postgraduate business students. Key findings include: the instrument has satisfactory psychometric properties; and scores obtained on the RASI using samples of MBA students are good predictors of academic performance in continuous assessment tasks but poor predictors of performance in examinations and oral presentations.

[1]  S. Severiens,et al.  Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis , 1994 .

[2]  John Biggs.  Personality correlates of certain dimensions of study behaviour , 1970 .

[3]  H W Marsh,et al.  Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Identifying distinctive approaches to studying , 1979 .

[5]  D. F. MARTENSON.  Students' approaches to studying in four medical schools , 1986, Medical education.

[6]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[7]  S. Newstead,et al.  A study of two "quick-and-easy" methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. , 1992, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Stephen Fox,et al.  From management education and development to the study of management learning , 1997 .

[10]  A. Duff.  Access policy and approaches to learning , 1999 .

[11]  Angus Duff,et al.  A note on the reliability and validity of a 30‐item version of Entwistle & Tait's Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory , 1997 .

[12]  A Fransson,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[13]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  Gender Differences in Human Cognition , 1997 .

[14]  Velda McCune,et al.  Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts , 2000 .

[15]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature Students in Higher Education: III. Approaches to studying in Access students , 1997 .

[16]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university , 1998 .

[17]  P. J. Janssen.  Studaxology: the expertise students need to be effective in higher education , 1996 .

[18]  L. Unwin,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2002 .

[19]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  APPROACHES TO STUDYING AND LEVELS OF PROCESSING IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 1988 .

[20]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory , 1993 .

[21]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[22]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Approaches to Studying: age, gender and academic performance , 1996 .

[23]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[25]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[26]  David Watkins,et al.  A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. , 1985 .

[27]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment , 1979 .

[28]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying Questionnaire , 1990 .

[29]  R. Waugh,et al.  A Rasch measurement model analysis of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. , 1998, The British journal of educational psychology.

[30]  C. D. Miller.  Learning Approaches and Motives: Male and Female Differences and Implications for Learning Assistance Programs. , 1990 .

[31]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying in distance education , 1999 .

[32]  Keithia Lynne Wilson,et al.  Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students , 1996 .

[33]  David Kember,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF FACTOR ANALYSES FROM THE APPROACHES TO STUDYING INVENTORY , 1989 .

[34]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[35]  Evaluating the Quality of Learning , 1987 .

[36]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[37]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender, subject and context as determinants of approaches to studying in higher education , 1995 .

[38]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies , 1996 .

[39]  David Watkins,et al.  Identifying the Study Process Dimensions of Australian University Students , 1982 .

[40]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  A gender comparison of contextualised study behaviour in higher education , 1994 .

[41]  Jhf Meyer,et al.  Evaluating the quality of student learning. I—An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying at an individual level , 1990 .

[42]  B. Thompson,et al.  Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some Guidelines , 1996 .

[43]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[44]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[45]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[46]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature students in higher education: Academic performance and intellectual ability , 1994 .

[47]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[48]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[49]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[50]  Angus Duff,et al.  The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its Use in Management Education , 2004 .

[51]  John Biggs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1978 .

[52]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature Students in Higher Education: II. An Investigation of Approaches to Studying and Academic Performance. , 1995 .

[53]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[54]  N. Entwistle.  Contrasting Perspectives on Learning , 2005 .

[55]  Jhf Meyer,et al.  Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the Lancaster inventory—A comparative study , 1989 .

[56]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[57]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[58]  Carol A. Speth,et al.  STUDY APPROACHES, PROCESSES AND STRATEGIES: ARE THREE PERSPECTIVES BETTER THAN ONE? , 1988 .

[59]  R. Pagano.  Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences , 1981 .