Post-lockdown abatement of COVID-19 by fast periodic switching

COVID-19 abatement strategies have risks and uncertainties which could lead to repeating waves of infection. We show-as proof of concept grounded on rigorous mathematical evidence-that periodic, high-frequency alternation of into, and out-of, lockdown effectively mitigates second-wave effects, while allowing continued, albeit reduced, economic activity. Periodicity confers (i) predictability, which is essential for economic sustainability, and (ii) robustness, since lockdown periods are not activated by uncertain measurements over short time scales. In turn-while not eliminating the virus-this fast switching policy is sustainable over time, and it mitigates the infection until a vaccine or treatment becomes available, while alleviating the social costs associated with long lockdowns. Typically, the policy might be in the form of 1-day of work followed by 6-days of lockdown every week (or perhaps 2 days working, 5 days off) and it can be modified at a slow-rate based on measurements filtered over longer time scales. Our results highlight the potential efficacy of high frequency switching interventions in post lockdown mitigation. All code is available on Github at https://github.com/V4p1d/FPSP_Covid19. A software tool has also been developed so that interested parties can explore the proof-of-concept system.

[1]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period , 2020, Science.

[2]  A. J. Hall.  Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[3]  P. Colaneri,et al.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[4]  S. Eubank,et al.  Commentary on Ferguson, et al., “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand” , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[5]  Pejman Rohani,et al.  Seasonnally forced disease dynamics explored as switching between attractors , 2001 .

[6]  Francesco De Lellis,et al.  A network model of Italy shows that intermittent regional strategies can alleviate the COVID-19 epidemic , 2020, Nature Communications.

[7]  Simone Buso,et al.  A dead-beat adaptive hysteresis current control , 1999, Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Forth IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36370).

[8]  Xinzhi Liu,et al.  Pulse and constant control schemes for epidemic models with seasonality , 2011 .

[9]  Xinzhi Liu,et al.  Infectious Disease Modeling , 2017 .

[10]  Analysis of thermostat models , 1997, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[11]  Robert Shorten,et al.  Stability Criteria for Switched and Hybrid Systems , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[12]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: Effects of emergency containment measures , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  D. Earn,et al.  Invariant predictions of epidemic patterns from radically different forms of seasonal forcing , 2019, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Francesco Casella,et al.  Can the COVID-19 Epidemic Be Controlled on the Basis of Daily Test Reports? , 2020, IEEE Control Systems Letters.

[15]  Bryan T Grenfell,et al.  Multiannual forecasting of seasonal influenza dynamics reveals climatic and evolutionary drivers , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  A. Phelan,et al.  COVID-19 immunity passports and vaccination certificates: scientific, equitable, and legal challenges , 2020, The Lancet.

[17]  Xinzhi Liu,et al.  The Switched SIR Model , 2017 .

[18]  Francesco Di Lauro,et al.  The timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control , 2020, medRxiv.

[19]  H. Hethcote,et al.  Effects of quarantine in six endemic models for infectious diseases. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[20]  L. Stone,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of recurrent epidemics , 2007, Nature.

[21]  J. Qi,et al.  Feasibility study of mitigation and suppression strategies for controlling COVID-19 outbreaks in London and Wuhan , 2020, PloS one.

[22]  Liying Zhu,et al.  The dynamics of an SIQS epidemic model with pulse quarantine , 2008, 2008 Chinese Control and Decision Conference.

[23]  T. Parisini,et al.  On Fast Multi-Shot Epidemic Interventions for Post Lock-Down Mitigation: Implications for Simple Covid-19 Models , 2020, ArXiv.

[24]  M. Eichenbaum,et al.  The Macroeconomics of Epidemics , 2020, The Review of Financial Studies.

[25]  N. Grassly,et al.  Seasonal infectious disease epidemiology , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Quentin J. Leclerc,et al.  Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[27]  Agata Mikolajczyk,et al.  The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China , 2020, Journal of travel medicine.

[28]  Aurelio Tobías,et al.  Evaluation of the lockdowns for the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Italy and Spain after one month follow up , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[29]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe , 2020, Nature.

[30]  Quentin J. Leclerc,et al.  Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[31]  Zvia Agur,et al.  Theoretical examination of the pulse vaccination policy in the SIR epidemic model , 2000 .

[32]  B. Barzel,et al.  Alternating quarantine for sustainable mitigation of COVID-19 , 2020, 2004.01453.

[33]  Liangrong Peng,et al.  Epidemic analysis of COVID-19 in China by dynamical modeling , 2020, medRxiv.

[34]  Junling Ma,et al.  Epidemic threshold conditions for seasonally forced seir models. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[35]  N. G. Davies,et al.  Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[36]  Uri Alon,et al.  Adaptive cyclic exit strategies from lockdown to suppress COVID-19 and allow economic activity , 2020, medRxiv.

[37]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Epidemics on Interconnected Networks , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  Martina Weber,et al.  The Employment Situation , 1919, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Postprints from CCDC Title Hysteresis-based switching algorithms for supervisory control of uncertain systems Permalink , 2002 .

[40]  A Simple Planning Problem for COVID-19 Lockdown , 2020 .

[41]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems , 1990 .

[42]  G Katriel,et al.  Modelling seasonal influenza: the role of weather and punctuated antigenic drift , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.