Class conditional entropic prior for MRI enhanced SPECT reconstruction

Maximum Likelihood Estimation can provide an accurate estimate of activity distribution for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), however its unconstrained application suffers from dimensional instability due to approximation of activity distribution to a grid of point processes. Correlation between the activity distribution and the underlying tissue morphology enables the use of information from an intra-subject anatomical image to improve the activity estimate. Several approaches have been proposed to include anatomical information in the process of activity estimation. Methods based on information theoretic similarity functionals are particularly appealing as they abstract from any assumption about the nature of the images. However, due to multiplicity of the similarity functional, such methods tend to discard boundary information from the anatomical image. This paper presents an extension of state of the art methods by introducing a hidden variable denoting tissue composition that conditions an entropie similarity functional. This allows one to include explicit knowledge of the MRI imaging system model, effectively introducing additional information. The proposed method provides an intrinsic edge-preserving feature, it outperforms conventional methods based on Joint Entropy in terms of bias/variance characteristics, and it does not introduce additional parameters.

[1]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Incorporation of Anatomical MR Data for Improved Dunctional Imaging with PET , 1991, IPMI.

[2]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Evaluation of different MRI-based anatomical priors for PET brain imaging , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[3]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[4]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Multimodality Bayesian algorithm for image reconstruction in positron emission tomography: a tissue composition model , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  T. Turkington,et al.  Accuracy of registration of PET, SPECT and MR images of a brain phantom. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The Use of Sieves to Stabilize Images Produced with the EM Algorithm for Emission Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  S. Pedemonte,et al.  GPU accelerated rotation-based emission tomography reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[8]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[10]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Bernd J. Pichler,et al.  PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results , 2008, European Radiology.

[12]  M. Lichy,et al.  Case Reports: Tumor Detection by Diffusion-Weighted MRI and ADC-Mapping with Correlation to PET/CT Results , 2009 .

[13]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[14]  H. Schlemmer,et al.  A look ahead: PET/MR versus PET/CT , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Jing Tang,et al.  Bayesian PET image reconstruction incorporating anato-functional joint entropy. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[18]  K. Rajan,et al.  Image reconstruction by conditional entropy maximisation for PET system , 2004 .

[19]  Dominique Van de Sompel,et al.  Robust Joint Entropy Regularization of Limited View Transmission Tomography Using Gaussian Approximations to the Joint Histogram , 2009, IPMI.

[20]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of functional images using anatomical information as priors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  PET IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION USING ANATOMICAL INFORMATION THROUGH MUTUAL INFORMATION BASED PRIORS: A SCALE SPACE APPROACH , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[23]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Utilizing MRI information to estimate F18-FDG distributions in rat flank tumors , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[24]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A Bayesian Joint Mixture Framework for the Integration of Anatomical Information in Functional Image Reconstruction , 2000, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[25]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Hill,et al.  Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  Simon R Cherry,et al.  In vivo molecular and genomic imaging: new challenges for imaging physics. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Zang-Hee Cho,et al.  A fusion PET–MRI system with a high‐resolution research tomograph‐PET and ultra‐high field 7.0 T‐MRI for the molecular‐genetic imaging of the brain , 2008, Proteomics.

[30]  R. Redner,et al.  Mixture densities, maximum likelihood, and the EM algorithm , 1984 .