Representations of student performance data in local education policy

[1]  Guri A. Nortvedt,et al.  Teachers responding to cultural diversity: case studies on assessment practices, challenges and experiences in secondary schools in Austria, Ireland, Norway and Turkey , 2020, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.

[2]  J. Vanhoof,et al.  The role of feedback acceptance and gaining awareness on teachers’ willingness to use inspection feedback , 2020 .

[3]  G. Skedsmo,et al.  Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies , 2020 .

[4]  Funny Numbers , 2020, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[5]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Comparing and assessing the consequences of two different approaches to measuring school effectiveness , 2019, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.

[6]  Noelle A. Paufler,et al.  Reframing conversations about teacher quality: school and district administrators’ perceptions of the validity, reliability, and justifiability of a new teacher evaluation system , 2019, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.

[7]  T. S. Prøitz,et al.  District administrators’ governing styles in the enactment of data-use practices , 2019, International Journal of Leadership in Education.

[8]  Sølvi Mausethagen,et al.  School leadership in data use practices: collegial and consensus-oriented , 2019, Educational Research.

[9]  A. Bergh.  Local quality work in an age of accountability – between autonomy and control , 2015, Policy Actors.

[10]  Orit Avidov-Ungar,et al.  Israeli Ministry of Education’s district managers’ and superintendents’ role as educational leaders—implementing the new policy for teachers’ professional development , 2018 .

[11]  Sølvi Mausethagen,et al.  Teachers’ use of knowledge sources in ‘result meetings’: thin data and thick data use. , 2018 .

[12]  Caitlin C. Farrell,et al.  Absorptive capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding district central office learning , 2016, Journal of Educational Change.

[13]  K. Steffensen,et al.  Er det forskjeller i skolers og kommuners bidrag til elevenes læring i grunnskolen? En kvantitativ studie , 2017 .

[14]  Guri Skedsmo,et al.  Investigative modes in research on data use in education , 2017 .

[15]  G. Skedsmo,et al.  Governing by new performance expectations in Norwegian schools , 2016 .

[16]  A. Amrein-Beardsley,et al.  Validating “value added” in the primary grades: one district’s attempts to increase fairness and inclusivity in its teacher evaluation system , 2016 .

[17]  S. Huber,et al.  Editorial: Data Use—a Key to Improve Teaching and Learning? , 2016 .

[18]  J. Jimerson.  How are we approaching data-informed practice? Development of the Survey of Data Use and Professional Learning , 2015, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.

[19]  Jingping Sun,et al.  A review of research on teachers’ use of student data: from the perspective of school leadership , 2016 .

[20]  Sara Carlbaum.  Customers, partners and rights-holders: School evaluations on websites , 2016 .

[21]  N. Selwyn.  ‘There’s so much data’: Exploring the realities of data-based school governance , 2016 .

[22]  M. Souto-Otero,et al.  From governing through data to governmentality through data: Artefacts, strategies and the digital turn , 2016 .

[23]  Richard Edwards,et al.  Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education , 2016 .

[24]  G. Gaskell,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations , 2015 .

[25]  K. Schildkamp,et al.  Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers , 2014 .

[26]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[27]  M. Lawn,et al.  Governing Education Systems by Shaping Data: From the Past to the Present, from National to International Perspectives , 2013 .

[28]  G. Skedsmo,et al.  Norway: Centralisation and Decentralisation as Twin Reform Strategies , 2013 .

[29]  J. Jennings.  The Effects of Accountability System Design on Teachers’ Use of Test Score Data , 2012 .

[30]  Brianna L. Kennedy-Lewis,et al.  High School Teachers' Use of Data to Inform Instruction , 2012 .

[31]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Quality, Standards and Accountability: An Uneasy Alliance , 2012 .

[32]  Peter Dahler-Larsen.  Constitutive effects as a social accomplishment: A qualitative study of the political in testing , 2012 .

[33]  Tine Sophie Prøitz,et al.  Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform - et løft eller et løfte? Forvaltningsnivåenes og institusjonenes rolle i implementeringen av reformen , 2012 .

[34]  Carol S. Parke.  Making Use of District and School Data , 2012 .

[35]  Jo Beth Jimerson,et al.  Organizational considerations in establishing the Data-Informed District , 2012 .

[36]  Jeannette A. Colyvas.  Performance Metrics as Formal Structures and through the Lens of Social Mechanisms: When Do They Work and How Do They Influence? , 2012, American Journal of Education.

[37]  James P. Spillane.  Data in Practice: Conceptualizing the Data-Based Decision-Making Phenomena , 2012, American Journal of Education.

[38]  Theodore M. Porter,et al.  Thin Description: Surface and Depth in Science and Science Studies , 2012, Osiris.

[39]  Peter Dahler-Larsen.  Evaluation as a situational or a universal good? Why evaluability assessment for evaluation systems is a good idea, what it might look like in practice, and why it is not fashionable , 2012 .

[40]  J. Little.  Understanding Data Use Practice among Teachers: The Contribution of Micro-Process Studies , 2011, American Journal of Education.

[41]  Christopher Downey,et al.  Professional attitudes to the use of pupil performance data in English secondary schools , 2011 .

[42]  C. Coburn,et al.  Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis , 2011 .

[43]  Richard Dufour,et al.  Leaders of Learning: How District, School, and Classroom Leaders Improve Student Achievement , 2011 .

[44]  M. Lawn.  Standardizing the European Education Policy Space , 2011 .

[45]  Peter Dahler-Larsen.  Afterword: Evaluation as a field and as a source of reflection: comments on how QAE restructures education now and in the future , 2011 .

[46]  Chris. Miller,et al.  Accountability Policy Implementation and the Case of Smaller School District Capacity: Three Contrasting Cases that Examine the Flow and Use of NCLB Accountability Data , 2010 .

[47]  Viki M. Young,et al.  Using Assessments for Instructional Improvement: A Literature Review. , 2010 .

[48]  Tim Hallett.  The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School , 2010 .

[49]  K. M. Merki,et al.  Handbuch Neue Steuerung im Schulsystem , 2010 .

[50]  Glenn A. Bowen.  Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method , 2009 .

[51]  C. Lundahl,et al.  Standardisation and ‘quick languages’: the shape‐shifting of standardised measurement of pupil achievement in Sweden and Germany , 2009 .

[52]  Antti Fredriksson.  On the Consequences of the Marketisation of Public Education in Sweden: For-Profit Charter Schools and the Emergence of the ‘market-oriented Teacher’ , 2009 .

[53]  Wendy Nelson Espeland,et al.  The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change , 2009 .

[54]  Linda E. Skrla,et al.  Districts as Institutional Actors in Educational Reform , 2008 .

[55]  Linda R. Valli,et al.  The Changing Roles of Teachers in an Era of High-Stakes Accountability , 2007 .

[56]  Peter Dahler-Larsen.  Constitutive Effects of Performance Indicator Systems , 2007 .

[57]  S. Kushner,et al.  Dilemmas of engagement : evaluation and the new public management , 2007 .

[58]  Julie A. Marsh,et al.  Strategies to Promote Data Use for Instructional Improvement: Actions, Outcomes, and Lessons fromThree Urban Districts , 2006, American Journal of Education.

[59]  Viki M. Young.  Teachers’ Use of Data: Loose Coupling, Agenda Setting, and Team Norms , 2006, American Journal of Education.

[60]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[61]  P. Selle,et al.  State and citizens in Norway: Organisational society and state – municipal relations , 2005 .

[62]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[63]  S. Ball.  The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity , 2003 .

[64]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Theory and method of social representations , 1999 .

[65]  Hugh Mehan,et al.  The Discourse of the Illegal Immigration Debate: A Case Study in the Politics of Representation , 1997 .

[66]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[67]  Hugh Mehan,et al.  Understanding practice: Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation , 1993 .

[68]  Z. Bauman.  Intimations of postmodernity , 1991 .