Equatorial plasma bubble generation/inhibition during 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm

All sky camera observations carried out over Taiwan showed intense equatorial plasma bubbles (EPB) in 630.0 nm airglow images on consecutive nights of 13-16 March, 2015, but was absent in the following night of 17 March when St. Patrick's Day magnetic storm occurred. Rate of total electron content (TEC) index by using Global Positioning System (GPS) network data also confirmed the absence of irregularities on the night 17 March. The results however revealed strong irregularities over Indian sector on the same night. Flux tube integrated Rayleigh-Taylor instability growth rates computed using the prior (forecast) state of Thermosphere-Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model output after assimilating the GPS-TEC measurements also agree with the observations, showing smaller values over Taiwan and larger values over India on the night of 17 March. The ionospheric response to the storm over Taiwan that resulted in the apparent inhibition of EPB is investigated in this study by using the data assimilation output. Results indicate that on the night of the magnetic storm, pre-reversal enhancement of zonal electric field over Taiwan was weaker when compared to that over India. Further analysis suggests that the absence of enhancement in the zonal electric field could be due to westward penetration electric field in response to rapid northward turning of interplanetary magnetic field that occurred during the dusk period over Taiwan.

[1]  Mike Hapgood,et al.  Astrophysics: Prepare for the coming space weather storm , 2012, Nature.

[2]  L. M. Joshi,et al.  Simulation of low‐latitude ionospheric response to 2015 St. Patrick's Day super geomagnetic storm using ionosonde‐derived PRE vertical drifts over Indian region , 2016 .

[3]  B. Fejer,et al.  An explanation for anomalous equatorial ionospheric electric fields associated with a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field , 1979 .

[4]  R. Roble,et al.  Long-lasting disturbances in the equatorial ionospheric electric field simulated with a coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere model , 2003 .

[5]  R. Redmon,et al.  Forecasting scintillation activity and equatorial spread F , 2017 .

[6]  H. Takahashi,et al.  Observations of day-to-day variability in precursor signatures to equatorial F-region plasma depletions , 1999 .

[7]  Keith M. Groves,et al.  Global equatorial plasma bubble occurrence during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm , 2016 .

[8]  Kefei Zhang,et al.  An analysis of the quiet time day‐to‐day variability in the formation of postsunset equatorial plasma bubbles in the Southeast Asian region , 2014 .

[9]  Keith M. Groves,et al.  Geomagnetic control of equatorial plasma bubble activity modeled by the TIEGCM with Kp , 2014 .

[10]  R. Tsunoda Day‐to‐day variability in equatorial spread F: Is there some physics missing? , 2006 .

[11]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  A model of the high‐latitude ionospheric convection pattern , 1982 .

[12]  Jann‐Yenq Liu,et al.  Ionospheric data assimilation with thermosphere‐ionosphere‐electrodynamics general circulation model and GPS‐TEC during geomagnetic storm conditions , 2016 .

[13]  P. J. Sultan,et al.  Linear theory and modeling of the Rayleigh‐Taylor instability leading to the occurrence of equatorial spread F , 1996 .

[14]  Takashi Maruyama,et al.  Longitudinal variability of annual changes in activity of equatorial spread F and plasma bubbles , 1984 .

[15]  D. Baker How to Cope with Space Weather , 2002, Science.

[16]  T. Yokoyama,et al.  Duskside enhancement of equatorial zonal electric field response to convection electric fields during the St. Patrick's Day storm on 17 March 2015 , 2016 .

[17]  K. Groves,et al.  Suppression of ionospheric scintillation during St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic super storm as observed over the anomaly crest region station Pingtung, Taiwan: A case study , 2017 .

[18]  Paul M. Kintner,et al.  Simultaneous Global Positioning System observations of equatorial scintillations and total electron content fluctuations , 1999 .

[19]  Tomoko Matsuo,et al.  Modeling the ionospheric prereversal enhancement by using coupled thermosphere‐ionosphere data assimilation , 2017 .

[20]  A. Mannucci,et al.  Prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and their ionospheric effects during the great magnetic storm of 30-31 October 2003 , 2008 .

[21]  P. K. Rajesh,et al.  Global equatorial plasma bubble growth rates using ionosphere data assimilation , 2017 .

[22]  Ronald F. Woodman,et al.  Equatorial spread F: Implications of VHF radar observations , 1970 .

[23]  T. Maruyama A diagnostic model for equatorial spread F, 1, Model description and application to electric field and neutral wind effects , 1988 .

[24]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Ionospheric responses to the October 2003 superstorm: Longitude/local time effects over equatorial low and middle latitudes , 2007 .

[25]  Xiaoqing Pi,et al.  Monitoring of global ionospheric irregularities using the Worldwide GPS Network , 1997 .

[26]  Mamoru Yamamoto,et al.  On the fresh development of equatorial plasma bubbles around the midnight hours of June solstice , 2016 .

[27]  M. A. Abdu,et al.  Magnetic declination control of the equatorial F region dynamo electric field development and spread F , 1981 .

[28]  Ludger Scherliess,et al.  Mid‐ and low‐latitude prompt‐penetration ionospheric zonal plasma drifts , 1998 .

[29]  C. Chen,et al.  Ionosphere data assimilation modeling of 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm , 2016 .

[30]  Qian Wu Longitudinal and seasonal variation of the equatorial flux tube integrated Rayleigh‐Taylor instability growth rate , 2015 .

[31]  R. Tsunoda On the enigma of day‐to‐day variability in equatorial spread F , 2005 .