Revealing the whiteboard to blind students: An inclusive approach to provide mediation in synchronous e-learning activities

Promoting the inclusion of students with disabilities in e-learning systems has brought many challenges for researchers and educators. The use of synchronous communication tools such as interactive whiteboards has been regarded as an obstacle for inclusive education. In this paper, we present the proposal of an inclusive approach to provide blind students with the possibility to participate in live learning sessions with whiteboard software. The approach is based on the provision of accessible textual descriptions by a live mediator. With the accessible descriptions, students are able to navigate through the elements and explore the content of the class using screen readers. The method used for this study consisted of the implementation of a software prototype within a virtual learning environment and a case study with the participation of a blind student in a live distance class. The results from the case study have shown that this approach can be very effective, and may be a starting point to provide blind students with resources they had previously been deprived from. The proof of concept implemented has shown that many further possibilities may be explored to enhance the interaction of blind users with educational content in whiteboards, and further pedagogical approaches can be investigated from this proposal.

[1]  Elizabeth H. Mohon.  SMART moves? A case study of one teacher’s pedagogical change through use of the interactive whiteboard , 2008 .

[2]  Joachim Klaus.  Living, Teaching and Learning at Any Time and at Any Place. e-Learning - Opportunities and Barriers for Visually Impaired Students , 2004, ICCHP.

[3]  Dave Berque,et al.  Teaching theory of computation using pen-based computers and an electronic whiteboard , 2001 .

[4]  Larry Hull,et al.  Accessibility: it's not just for disabilities any more , 2004, INTR.

[5]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning , 2007 .

[6]  Sigrid E. Schubert,et al.  Development of E-Learning Design Criteria with Secure Realization Concepts , 2008, Learning to Live in the Knowledge Society.

[7]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Wolfgang L. Zagler,et al.  Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs , 2008 .

[9]  Mariluz Guenaga,et al.  Accessibility for e-Learning Environments , 2004, ICCHP.

[10]  S. Higgins,et al.  The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Teacher--Pupil Interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. , 2006 .

[11]  Julia Gillen,et al.  A ‘learning revolution’? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms 1 , 2007 .

[12]  Euline Cutrim Schmid,et al.  Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Computer assisted mediation for blind children , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel,et al.  Prototyping Applications to Document Human Experiences , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[15]  Fang Liu,et al.  The Smart Classroom: Merging Technologies for Seamless Tele-education , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[16]  P. Warwick,et al.  Primary teachers’ understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children’s collaborative learning and knowledge‐building , 2008 .

[17]  Xiaoyu Chen,et al.  AudioBrowser: a mobile browsable information access for the visually impaired , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Mike Wald,et al.  Universal access to communication and learning: the role of automatic speech recognition , 2008, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[19]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Classroom 2000: An Experiment with the Instrumentation of a Living Educational Environment , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[20]  Sigrid E. Schubert,et al.  Development of E-Learning Design Criteria with Secure Realization Concepts , 2008, ISSEP.

[21]  Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel,et al.  Achieving causal and total ordering in publish/subscribe middleware with DSM , 2008, MW4SOC '08.

[22]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[23]  Roland T. Mittermeir,et al.  Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking, Third International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2008, Torun, Poland, July 1-4, 2008, Proceedings , 2008, ISSEP.

[24]  Ian Hall,et al.  Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Hannah Slay,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  ActiveTheatre - A Collaborative, Event-Based Capture and Access System for the Operating Theatre , 2005, UbiComp.

[27]  David Miller,et al.  The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: an empirical analysis from the secondary sector , 2007 .