Measuring Technological Novelty with Patent-Based Indicators

This study provides a new, more comprehensive measurement of technological novelty. Integrating insights from the existing economics and management literature, we characterize inventions ex ante along two dimensions of technological novelty: Novelty in Recombination and Novelty in Knowledge Origins. For the latter dimension we distinguish between Novel Technological and Novel Scientific Origins. For each dimension we propose an operationalization using patent classification and citation information. Results indicate that the proposed measures for the different dimensions of technological novelty are correlated, but each conveys different information. We perform a series of analyses to assess the validity of the proposed measures and compare them with other indicators used in the literature. Moreover, an analysis of the technological impact of inventions identified as novel shows that technological novelty increases the variance of technological impact and the likelihood of being among the positive outliers with respect to impact. This holds particularly for those inventions that combine Novelty in Recombination with Novelty in Technological and Scientific Origins. The results support our indicators as ex ante measures of technological novelty driving potentially radical impact.

[1]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation , 2013 .

[2]  Charles W. L. Hill,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[3]  José Emilio Navas-López,et al.  Radical innovation from relations-based knowledge: empirical evidence in Spanish technology-intensive firms , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[5]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[6]  G. Day,et al.  Shakeouts in Digital Markets: Lessons from B2B Exchanges , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[8]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[9]  B. Nooteboom.  Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation Systems , 2000 .

[10]  José Lobo,et al.  Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention , 2015 .

[11]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[12]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[13]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[14]  G. Nemet.  Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .

[15]  Ellinor Ehrnberg,et al.  On the definition and measurement of technological discontinuities , 1995 .

[16]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Financing of R&D and Innovation , 2009 .

[17]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[18]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[19]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Fred Block,et al.  Where do Innovations Come From? Transformations in the U.S. Economy, 1970-2006 , 2009 .

[21]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Inventions shaping technological trajectories: do existing patent indicators provide a comprehensive picture? , 2013, Scientometrics.

[22]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Patents : Recent Trends and Puzzles , 2007 .

[23]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[24]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[25]  R. Henderson.  Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .

[26]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[27]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[29]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[30]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Entrepreneurial Enterprises, Large Established Firms and Other Components of the Free-Market Growth Machine , 2004 .

[31]  Ronald Mascitelli.  From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation , 2000 .

[32]  P. Ritala,et al.  Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition—The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability , 2013 .

[33]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[34]  Francis Narin,et al.  Citation rates to technologically important patents , 1981 .

[35]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Learning from users for radical innovation , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[36]  M. Shellabear,et al.  DMLS - DEVELOPMENT HISTORY AND STATE OF THE ART , 2004 .

[37]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[38]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[40]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and the sources of breakthrough inventions: evidence from a data-set of R&D awards , 2012 .

[41]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[42]  Preeta M. Banerjee,et al.  Globally Radical Technologies and Locally Radical Technologies: The Role of Audiences in the Construction of Innovative Impact in Biotechnology , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[43]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Model of Radical Innovation in Small Software Firms , 2012, MIS Q..

[44]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[45]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[46]  J. Michael Ramsey,et al.  Effects of injection schemes and column geometry on the performance of microchip electrophoresis devices , 1994 .

[47]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[48]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance , 2003 .

[49]  Lynne P. Cooper,et al.  Knowledge Reuse for Innovation , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Vetle I. Torvik,et al.  Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010) , 2014 .

[51]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[52]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. , 1941 .

[53]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[54]  L. Fleming.  Breakthroughs and the ¿Long Tail¿ of Innovation , 2007 .

[55]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[56]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The determinants of small-firm growth in US manufacturing , 1990 .

[57]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[58]  Robert W. Veryzer.  The Roles of Marketing and Industrial Design in Discontinuous New Product Development , 2005 .

[59]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs , 2001 .

[60]  S. Hart,et al.  Roles, role performance, and radical innovation competences , 2011 .

[61]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[62]  Tom Magerman,et al.  Data Production Methods for Hamonized Patent Statistics: Patentee Sector Allocation , 2006 .

[63]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[64]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[65]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Appropriability Regime for Radical and Incremental Innovations , 2008 .

[66]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references , 2011, Scientometrics.

[67]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[68]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[69]  Sandeep Kapur,et al.  On Technological Expectations , 1992 .

[70]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[71]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck,et al.  The puzzle of patent value indicators , 2011 .

[72]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The structure of invention , 2007 .

[73]  Catalina Martínez,et al.  Patent families: When do different definitions really matter? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[74]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[75]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Patent citation indicators: One size fits all? , 2015, Scientometrics.

[76]  Mary Tripsas.  Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[77]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[78]  D. Schendel,et al.  Strategic responses to technological threats , 1976 .

[79]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[80]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams , 2003 .