Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?

We estimated ideological preferences of 3.8 million Twitter users and, using a data set of nearly 150 million tweets concerning 12 political and nonpolitical issues, explored whether online communication resembles an “echo chamber” (as a result of selective exposure and ideological segregation) or a “national conversation.” We observed that information was exchanged primarily among individuals with similar ideological preferences in the case of political issues (e.g., 2012 presidential election, 2013 government shutdown) but not many other current events (e.g., 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, 2014 Super Bowl). Discussion of the Newtown shootings in 2012 reflected a dynamic process, beginning as a national conversation before transforming into a polarized exchange. With respect to both political and nonpolitical issues, liberals were more likely than conservatives to engage in cross-ideological dissemination; this is an important asymmetry with respect to the structure of communication that is consistent with psychological theory and research bearing on ideological differences in epistemic, existential, and relational motivation. Overall, we conclude that previous work may have overestimated the degree of ideological segregation in social-media usage.

[1]  Steuart Henderson Britt,et al.  Review of The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. , 1945 .

[2]  G. Brier.  VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY , 1950 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. , 1966 .

[4]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[5]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms , 1972, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  James M. Enelow,et al.  The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction , 1984 .

[7]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[8]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[9]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[10]  M. Greenacre.  Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .

[11]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[13]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[14]  Not for all the tea in China . . . , 1999 .

[15]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[16]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Biased Assimilation of Sociopolitical Arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential Debate , 2002 .

[18]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  I like myself but I don't know why: enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Joshua D. Clinton,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[22]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Theory and Research in Mass Communication , 2004 .

[23]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[24]  Susan M. Shortreed,et al.  Positional Estimation Within a Latent Space Model for Networks , 2006 .

[25]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[26]  J. Jost.  The end of the end of ideology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[27]  Michael Pfau,et al.  Mediating the Vote: The Changing Media Landscape in U.S. Presidential Campaigns , 2006 .

[28]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty–Identity Theory , 2007 .

[29]  Michael Greenacre,et al.  Correspondence Analysis in R, with Two- and Three-dimensional Graphics: The ca Package , 2007 .

[30]  John Gastil,et al.  How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns byRichard R. Lau and David Redlawsk , 2007 .

[31]  S. Gosling,et al.  A Theory of the Emergence, Persistence, and Expression of Geographic Variation in Psychological Characteristics , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[32]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  S. Gosling,et al.  The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind , 2008 .

[34]  W. Lowe,et al.  Understanding Wordscores , 2008, Political Analysis.

[35]  Yogi Berra,et al.  You Can Observe A Lot By Watching: What I've Learned About Teamwork From the Yankees and Life , 2008 .

[36]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[37]  A.M.J. Derks.  Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections , 2009 .

[38]  R. Garrett.  Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate , 2009 .

[39]  S. Jessee,et al.  Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[41]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Detecting Spam in a Twitter Network , 2009, First Monday.

[43]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[44]  Joseph Bafumi,et al.  Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[45]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[46]  Gregory A. Huber,et al.  Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Juliane M. Stopfer,et al.  Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization , 2010, Psychological science.

[48]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Ideological Segregation Online and Offline , 2010 .

[49]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[50]  Jingbo Meng,et al.  Selective Exposure to Attitude-Consistent and Counterattitudinal Political Information , 2011 .

[51]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Predicting Personality from Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[52]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[53]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Daylength Across Diverse Cultures , 2011 .

[54]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  OpenOrd: an open-source toolbox for large graph layout , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[55]  Jeffrey R. Lax,et al.  The Democratic Deficit in the States , 2012 .

[56]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Partisan asymmetries in online political activity , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[57]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion , 2012, ArXiv.

[58]  Vern Paxson,et al.  Adapting Social Spam Infrastructure for Political Censorship , 2012, LEET.

[59]  D. Kahan.  Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[60]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  John T. Jost,et al.  “Not for All the Tea in China!” Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations , 2013, PloS one.

[62]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[63]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Adam Bonica,et al.  Mapping the Ideological Marketplace , 2013 .

[65]  J. Jost,et al.  Ideological Differences in Epistemic Motivation: Implications for Attitude Structure, Depth of Information Processing, Susceptibility to Persuasion, and Stereotyping , 2014 .

[66]  R. M. Alvarez.  Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data , 2014 .

[67]  Cherie D. Maestas,et al.  Extracting Wisdom from Experts and Small Crowds: Strategies for Improving Informant-based Measures of Political Concepts , 2014, Political Analysis.

[68]  Pablo Barberá.  Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data , 2015, Political Analysis.

[69]  Robert M. Bond,et al.  Quantifying Social Media’s Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook , 2015, American Political Science Review.

[70]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[71]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.