Increased survival of vascularized organ allografts in the rat has been achieved by active host immunization with donor antigen, passive immunization with alloantise-

Increased survival of vascularized organ allografts in the rat has been achieved by active host immunization with donor antigen, passive immunization with alloantiserum, and a combination of both (1-5). The original concept, as suggested by Kaliss, that immunological enhancement is mediated by host humoral factors, is still widely held, although the exact mechanisms involved in its initiation and maintenance remain unresolved (6). However, passive transfer of serum from enhanced animals rarely increases survival of test aliografts, despite detection of humoral blocking factors in some enhancement models (7). The contributions to allograft enhancement by the cellular-immune responses have not been rigorously assessed, although evidence for in vivo activity of cells capable of causing specific unresponsiveness has been found in other animal systems: for example, host responses against tumors may be influenced by cells or cellular products (8-10), which also act in delayed hypersensitivity (11-13) and graft-versus-host reactions (14-16). In studies of transplantation tolerance, induced neonatally, suppressor cells have been demonstrated primarily to be recirculating T cells which show specificity in vivo to donor strain tissues (17, 18). We have shown previously that spleen cells and infiltrating leukocytes isolated from well-functioning cardiac allografts in enhanced adult rats suppress spontaneous blastogenesis of normal syngeneic cells in vitro (19). Additionally, preliminary observations in vivo have suggested that lymphoid cells from enhanced animals bearing a well-functioning organ aUograft are able to transfer a state of specific unresponsiveness to unmodified recipients (20). The present studies demonstrate the precise activity of thymocytes in the early phase of immunological enhancement, confirm the specificity of this effect, and describe the necessity of an intact thymus for continued survival of the grafted organ in an enhanced host. Our observations suggest that the phenomenon of enhancement of organ atlografts induced by particular immunizing protocols, involves cellular as well as humoral mechanisms.

[1]  T. Strom,et al.  Prolongation of organ allograft survival by syngeneic lymphoid cells. , 1978, Journal of immunology.

[2]  W. Baldwin,et al.  ENHANCED ALLOGRAFT SURVIVAL BY COMBINED ACTIVE AND PASSIVE IMMUNIZATION: REQUIREMENT OF BOTH ERYTHROCYTES AND LEUKOCYTES , 1978, Transplantation.

[3]  J. Bancewicz,et al.  ENHANCEMENT OF CARDIAC ALLOGRAFTS IN RATS: COMPARISON OF HOST RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT TREATMENT PROTOCOLS , 1978, Transplantation.

[4]  J. R. Batchelor,et al.  Absence of suppressor cells from rats bearing passively enhanced kidney allografts , 1977, Nature.

[5]  T. Strom,et al.  Cellular components of allograft rejection: identity, specificity, and cytotoxic function of cells infiltrating acutely rejecting allografts. , 1977, Journal of immunology.

[6]  S. Dorsch,et al.  Recirculating, suppressor T cells in transplantation tolerance , 1977, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  T. Strom,et al.  Identification, cytotoxicity, and suppressor activity of infiltrating cells from enhanced organ allografts. , 1977, Transplantation proceedings.

[8]  P. Kilshaw,et al.  Further studies on suppressor T cells in mice unresponsive to H-2-incompatible skin grafts. , 1977, Transplantation proceedings.

[9]  D. Scollard,et al.  CELLULAR AND HUMORAL IMMUNITY AFTER ALLOGENEIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN THE RAT: V. Appearance of Anti‐Idiotypic Antibody and its Relationship to Cellular Immunity after Treatment with Donor Spleen Cells and Alloantibody , 1976, Transplantation.

[10]  F. Fitch,et al.  Immunological enhancement of renal allografts by antireceptor antibody. , 1976, Surgery.

[11]  M. Greene,et al.  Regulation of the immune response to tumor antigens. II. The nature of immunosuppressor cells in tumor-bearing hosts. , 1976, Journal of immunology.

[12]  T. Strom,et al.  Studies on infiltrating host cells harvested from acutely rejecting rat cardiac allografts. , 1976, Surgery.

[13]  T. Strom,et al.  The role of nonclassical Fc receptor-associated, Ag-B antigens (Ia) in rat allograft enhancement , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  T. Strom,et al.  MODIFICATION OF THE RAT ALLOIMMUNE RESPONSE BY ENHANCING ANTIBODIES AND THE ROLE OF BLOCKING FACTORS IN THE SURVIVAL OF RENAL GRAFTS , 1975, Transplantation.

[15]  T. Strom,et al.  SURFACE PROPERTIES AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INFILTRATING CELLS HARVESTED FROM ACUTELY REJECTING CARDIAC ALLOGRAFTS IN INBRED RATS , 1975, Transplantation.

[16]  R. Rich,et al.  Regulatory mechanisms in cell-mediated immune responses. IV. Expression of a receptor for mixed lymphocyte reaction suppressor factor on activated T lymphocytes , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  G. Asherson,et al.  Suppression of contact sensitivity by T cells in the mouse. I. Demonstration that suppressor cells act on the effector stage of contact sensitivity; and their induction following in vitro exposure to antigen , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  H. Claman,et al.  Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. 3. Transfer of tolerance with "suppressor T cells". , 1974, Journal of immunology.

[19]  E. Golub,et al.  The distribution of brain-associated theta antigen cross-reactive with mouse in the brain of other species. , 1972, Journal of immunology.

[20]  W. Elkins Cellular control of lymphocytes initiating graft vs. host reactions. , 1972, Cellular immunology.

[21]  M. Mokyr,et al.  Specific inhibition of receptors for cytophilic antibody on macrophages by isoantibody. , 1972, Cancer research.

[22]  G. Asherson,et al.  The mechanism of immunological unresponsiveness to picryl chloride and the possible role of antibody mediated depression. , 1971, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[23]  T. Tada,et al.  Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. 3. Effect of thymectomy and splenectomy. , 1971, Journal of immunology.

[24]  P. Baker,et al.  Evidence for the existence of two functionally distinct types of cells which regulate the antibody response to type 3 pneumococcal polysaccharide. , 1970, Journal of immunology.

[25]  R. Gershon,et al.  Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. , 1970, Immunology.

[26]  M. Raff,et al.  Immunoglobulin Determinants on the Surface of Mouse Lymphoid Cells , 1970, Nature.

[27]  B. Heslop,et al.  Immunological enhancement of rat kidney grafts. , 1969, Lancet.

[28]  W. Boyle AN EXTENSION OF THE51Cr-RELEASE ASSAY FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MOUSE CYTOTOXINS , 1968, Transplantation.

[29]  F. Fitch,et al.  Rejection of Renal Allografts: Specific Immunologic Suppression , 1968, Science.

[30]  B. Chapuis,et al.  Quantitative assay of the lytic action of immune lymphoid cells on 51-Cr-labelled allogeneic target cells in vitro; inhibition by isoantibody and by drugs. , 1968, Immunology.

[31]  N. Kaliss Immunological enhancement of tumor homografts in mice: a review. , 1958, Cancer research.

[32]  A. Abbas,et al.  The role of antibodies in the rejection and enhancement of organ allografts.?7318. , 1976, Advances in immunology.

[33]  A. J. Crowle,et al.  Adoptive transfer of neonatal tolerance into normal mice. Abstr. , 1971 .