The STEP into Action study: a peer-based, personal risk network-focused HIV prevention intervention with injection drug users in Baltimore, Maryland.

AIMS To assess the effectiveness of a peer-based, personal risk network-focused HIV prevention intervention to (i) train injection drug users (IDUs) to reduce injection and sex risk behaviors, (ii) conduct outreach to behaviorally risky individuals in their personal social networks [called risk network members (RNM)], and (iii) reduce RNM HIV risk behaviors. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial with prospective data collection at 6, 12 and 18 months. Intervention condition consisted of five group sessions, one individual session and one session with Index and the RNM. SETTING This study was conducted in Baltimore, Maryland from March 2004 to March 2006. PARTICIPANTS (i) Index participants were aged ≥ 18 years and self-reported injection drug use in the prior 6 months and (ii) their RNM who were aged ≥ 18 years and drug users or sex partners of Index. MEASUREMENTS Outcomes included: (i) injection risk based on sharing needles, cookers and cotton for injection and drug splitting, (ii) sex risk based on number of sex partners, condom use and exchanging sex and (iii) Index HIV outreach behaviors. FINDINGS A total of 227 Index participants recruited 336 RNM. Retention of Index at 18-month follow-up exceeded 85%. Findings suggest that the experimental condition was efficacious at 18 months in reducing Index participant injection risk [odds ratio (OR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18-0.77), drug-splitting risk (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.25-0.88) and sex risk among Index (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34-0.86). Significant intervention effect on increased condom use among female RNM was observed (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18-0.62). CONCLUSIONS Training active IDU to promote HIV prevention with behaviorally risky individuals in their networks is feasible, efficacious and sustainable.

[1]  J. Kelly,et al.  Community AIDS/HIV risk reduction: the effects of endorsements by popular people in three cities. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[2]  D. Huo,et al.  Needle Exchange and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among a Cohort of Injection Drug Users in Chicago, Illinois , 2009, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[3]  Caitlin Kennedy,et al.  Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[4]  D. Vlahov,et al.  HIV Incidence Among Injection Drug Users in Baltimore, Maryland (1988-2004) , 2006, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[5]  C. Latkin,et al.  Residential Transience and HIV Risk Behaviors Among Injection Drug Users , 2007, AIDS and Behavior.

[6]  Tom Perdue,et al.  The efficacy of a network intervention to reduce HIV risk behaviors among drug users and risk partners in Chiang Mai, Thailand and Philadelphia, USA. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[7]  N. El-Bassel,et al.  Long-Term Effects of an HIV/STI Sexual Risk Reduction Intervention for Heterosexual Couples , 2005, AIDS and Behavior.

[8]  Joseph Cox,et al.  The importance of social networks in their association to drug equipment sharing among injection drug users: a review. , 2007, Addiction.

[9]  M. Weeks,et al.  Times and Places: Process Evaluation of a Peer-Led HIV Prevention Intervention , 2006, Substance use & misuse.

[10]  R. Platt,et al.  HIV and HCV discordant injecting partners and their association to drug equipment sharing , 2009, Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[11]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[12]  D. D. Des Jarlais,et al.  Reductions in hepatitis C virus and HIV infections among injecting drug users in New York City, 1990–2001 , 2005, AIDS.

[13]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[14]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[15]  A. Estrada Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis among minority injection drug users. , 2002, Public health reports.

[16]  T. Rhodes Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. , 2009, The International journal on drug policy.

[17]  Julio S. G. Montaner,et al.  Characteristics of Injection Drug Users Who Participate in Drug Dealing: Implications for Drug Policy , 2008, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[18]  S. Kalichman,et al.  Behavioral research in HIV/AIDS primary and secondary prevention: recent advances and future directions. , 2002, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup behaviour , 1974 .

[20]  C. Latkin,et al.  Social Norms, Social Networks, and HIV Risk Behavior Among Injection Drug Users , 2010, AIDS and Behavior.

[21]  A. Baron,et al.  Drug Sharing Among Heroin Networks: Implications for HIV and Hepatitis B and C Prevention , 2005, AIDS and Behavior.

[22]  Carl A Latkin,et al.  HIV prevention among drug users: outcome of a network-oriented peer outreach intervention. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  J. Twisk,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology: A Practical Guide , 2003 .