The role and status of qualitative methods in management research: an empirical account

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a piece of empirical work that investigates the current role and status of qualitative research within the management field.Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on 45 in‐depth qualitative interviews with members of a range of different stakeholder groups, including: journal editors; qualitative researchers; Doctoral Programme Leaders; practitioners; and those who fund qualitative management research.Findings – The findings suggest that there is considerable variety in definitions of qualitative research; that there are still a number of issues surrounding the status and credibility of qualitative research within the field; and there is a need for greater access to researcher training in this area.Practical implications – The paper is of practical interest to qualitative researchers in that it details some of the issues surrounding publishing qualitative work.Originality/value – The paper presents original empirical work in this field.

[1]  R. Gephart.  Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[2]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[3]  C. Seale.  Qualitative research practice , 2004 .

[4]  John,et al.  Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research: A Preface. , 1979 .

[5]  David R. Maines,et al.  Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. , 1989 .

[6]  Benchmarking good practice in qualitative management research , 2006 .

[7]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[8]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[9]  P. Reason,et al.  Human inquiry : a sourcebook of new paradigm research , 1983 .

[10]  Catherine Cassell,et al.  Promoting New Research Practices in Organizational Research , 2004 .

[11]  Thomas W. Lee.  From the Editors On Qualitative Research in AMJ , 2001 .

[12]  C. Cassell,et al.  Expanding our research and practice through innovative research methods , 2000 .

[13]  D. Tranfield,et al.  The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy , 1998 .

[14]  D. Silverman.  Qualitative research : theory, method and practice , 2004 .

[15]  Jörgen Sandberg.  How Do We Justify Knowledge Produced Within Interpretive Approaches? , 2005 .

[16]  C. Seale,et al.  Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[17]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  Qualitative Research in Organizational and Vocational Psychology, 1979–1999 , 1999 .

[18]  H. Shepard,et al.  Men Who Manage , 1959 .

[19]  Clare Tagg,et al.  Managers and Research , 2000 .

[20]  Anna Buehring,et al.  Evaluating Qualitative Management Research: Towards a Contingent Criteriology , 2006 .

[21]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[22]  L. Johnston.  Template analysis. , 1987, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[23]  T. Watson,et al.  In Search of Management: Culture, Chaos and Control in Managerial Work , 1996 .

[24]  Ernst von Kardorff Uwe Flick,et al.  A Companion to Qualitative Research , 2004 .

[25]  Anshuman Prasad,et al.  The Coming of Age of Interpretive Organizational Research , 2002 .

[26]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[27]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[28]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .