Evacuation plan evaluation: Assessment of mandatory and voluntary vehicular evacuation schemes by means of an analytical dynamic travel model

In this paper an evacuation simulation model is proposed, combining a dynamic travel demand component, an adaptive travel choice behavior component, and a dynamic network loading component. The travel demand component considers the primary choice facing the endangered residents, whether to participate in the evacuation, and if so, when to depart. The travel choice behavior component considers the secondary choice facing the evacuees, where to seek refuge and by which route to travel towards this safe destination. The network loading component considers both the dynamic traffic and hazard conditions, and propagates the evacuees through the infrastructure network. The proposed evacuation model can act on a broad spectrum of hazards, as it uses general features to compute the effects of the hazard on the evacuation. Furthermore, the model structure enables the assessment of various categories of evacuation, ranging from a voluntary evacuation to a mandatory evacuation. And, the behavioral responses of the evacuees towards evacuation instructions are modeled, such that instructions can be followed fully, followed in part, or rejected completely. Hence, the evacuation model has the potential to function as the decision support system for the supervising authority, while deciding on the appropriate evacuation scheme and the level of enforcement. An illustrative example of a hypothetical evacuation shows the principles and possibilities of the proposed evacuation model.

[1]  Francis C. McMichael,et al.  Safety goals for high‐hazard dams: Are dams too safe? , 1990 .

[2]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF FLOODING FOR USE IN FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN THE RED RIVER BASIN , 1997 .

[3]  Ross T. Newkirk The Increasing Cost of Disasters in Developed Countries: A Challenge to Local Planning and Government , 2001 .

[4]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations , 1997 .

[5]  J. Apt,et al.  Planning for natural disasters in a stochastic world , 2006 .

[6]  F. Nisha de Silva,et al.  Providing spatial decision support for evacuation planning: a challenge in integrating technologies , 2001 .

[7]  Brian Wolshon,et al.  PLANNING FOR THE EVACUATION OF NEW ORLEANS , 2002 .

[8]  Adam J. Pel,et al.  Evacuation Plan Evaluation: Assessment of Vehicular Evacuation Schemes by means of an Analytical Dynamic Traffic Model , 2007 .

[9]  Alan D. Baddeley Selective attention and performance in dangerous environments. , 1972 .

[10]  John M. Rose,et al.  Understanding household evacuation decisions using a stated choice survey: case study of bush fires , 2005 .

[11]  Wolfgang Haider,et al.  Post‐flood assessment of emergency evacuation policies in the Red River basin, Southern Manitoba , 2008 .

[12]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods and their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions , 1999 .

[13]  Earl J. Baker,et al.  Hurricane Evacuation Behavior , 1991, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[14]  P. Hancock Human Factors Psychology , 1987 .

[15]  William H. Hooke U.S. PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL DECADE FOR NATURAL DISASTER REDUCTION , 2000 .

[16]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Review of Procedures Associated with Devising Emergency Evacuation Plans , 2004 .

[17]  R. Woodworth Dynamics of behavior , 1958 .

[18]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  Response to Social Crisis and Disaster , 1977 .

[19]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.