Latin American Regionalism in a Multipolar World

The landscape of Latin American regionalism has experienced profound transformations in a relatively short period of time. Regional organizations have proliferated; the open regionalism of the 1990s has gone into decay; new organizations, often referred to as belonging to a new wave of a more political “posthegemonic regionalism,” took center stage; only to be displaced in the attention of observers by newer trade-oriented organizations such as the Pacific Alliance. These developments have been puzzling scholars and policy makers, who for their most part have tended to converge on the view that a fragmented regional configuration with diverging or even incompatible models of regional integration is on the rise. This article challenges this interpretation by arguing that many of the trends we observe are rather the result of Latin American states’ practical adaptation of their foreign policy strategies to the emergence of a multipolar political economy in the international system. One important consequence of this process of adaptation, I argue, is a “decoupling” of the economic function of regionalism from its other dimensions – a process that I show is facilitating the emergence of a regional architecture characterized by a finer division of labor among organizations.

[1]  Jorge F. Garzón Multipolarity and the Future of Regionalism: Latin America and Beyond , 2015 .

[2]  Sebastian Krapohl,et al.  Regional Powers as Leaders or Rambos? The Ambivalent Behaviour of Brazil and South Africa in Regional Economic Integration , 2014 .

[3]  C. Quiliconi Competitive Diffusion of Trade Agreements in Latin America , 2014 .

[4]  Amitav Acharya The End of American World Order , 2014 .

[5]  A. Frenkel,et al.  Una Unasur de baja intensidad. Modelos en pugna y desaceleración del proceso de integración en América del Sur , 2014 .

[6]  José Briceño‐Ruiz Regional Dynamics and External Influences in the Discussions About the Model of Economic Integration in Latin America , 2014 .

[7]  G. Gardini The added value of the Pacific Alliance and ‘modular regionalism’ in Latin America , 2013 .

[8]  Cintia Quiliconi Modelos competitivos de integración en el hemisferio occidental: ¿liderazgo competitivo o negación mutua? , 2013 .

[9]  P. Riggirozzi,et al.  The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism : the case of Latin America , 2012 .

[10]  A. Malamud,et al.  Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and its Lessons , 2012 .

[11]  P. Riggirozzi,et al.  The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in Latin America , 2012 .

[12]  Olivier Dabène Consistency and Resilience through Cycles of Repoliticization , 2012 .

[13]  J. Battaglino Defence in a Post-Hegemonic Regional Agenda: The Case of the South American Defence Council , 2012 .

[14]  P. Riggirozzi Region, Regionness and Regionalism in Latin America: Towards a New Synthesis , 2012 .

[15]  M. Bacchetta,et al.  The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence , 2011 .

[16]  N. Phillips The Demise of New Regionalism: Reframing the Study of Contemporary Regional Integration in Latin America , 2011 .

[17]  D. Tussie Latin America: contrasting motivations for regional projects , 2009, Review of International Studies.

[18]  Sean W. Burges Brazilian Foreign Policy After the Cold War , 2009 .

[19]  Lael Brainard,et al.  Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil's Changing Role in the Global Economy , 2009 .

[20]  J. Sanahuja Del "regionalismo abierto" al regionalismo post-liberal. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina y el Caribe , 2009 .

[21]  Alfred. Tovias The Brave New World of Cross-Regionalism , 2008 .

[22]  Sean W. Burges Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War , 2008 .

[23]  S. Evenett,et al.  An Interim Assessment of the US Trade Policy of 'Competitive Liberalization' , 2008 .

[24]  P. Veiga BRAZIL’S TRADE POLICY: MOVING AWAY , 2008 .

[25]  Mireya Solís,et al.  Cross regional trade agreements : understanding permeated regionalism in East Asia , 2008 .

[26]  S. Katada,et al.  Permeated Regionalism in East Asia: Cross-Regional Trade Agreements in Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[27]  S. Katada,et al.  Cross-Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia: Findings and Implications , 2008 .

[28]  Leslie Elliott Armijo THE BRICS COUNTRIES (BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, AND CHINA) AS ANALYTICAL CATEGORY: MIRAGE OR INSIGHT? , 2007 .

[29]  John Whalley,et al.  Recent Regional Agreements: Why so Many, Why so Much Variance in Form, Why Coming so Fast, and Where are They Headed? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  Sean W. Burges Bounded by the Reality of Trade: Practical Limits to a South American Region , 2005 .

[31]  J. Crawford,et al.  The changing landscape of regional trade agreements , 2005 .

[32]  John Whalley,et al.  China's New Regional Trade Agreements , 2004 .

[33]  V. Aggarwal,et al.  Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Interregional Trade Strategies , 2003 .

[34]  Wilfred J. Ethier The New Regionalism , 1998 .

[35]  Raquel Fernández,et al.  Returns to Regionalism: An Analysis of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements , 1998 .

[36]  R. Garnaut Open regionalism and trade liberalization : an Asia-Pacific contribution to the world trade system , 1996 .

[37]  Jason P. Abbott,et al.  State Strategies in the Global Political Economy , 1996 .

[38]  A. Gamble,et al.  Introduction: The Political Economy of Regionalism and World Order , 1996 .