Three-Dimensional Characterization of Torsion and Asymmetry of the Intervertebral Discs Versus Vertebral Bodies in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. To compare the relative contribution of the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs with the 3-dimensional spinal deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. There is an ongoing discussion about the causal role of skeletal growth processes in the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Contradictory findings have been reported on the individual contribution of the vertebral bodies as compared with the discs to the coronal deformity. As far as we know, the true 3-dimensional deformity of the discs and vertebral bodies have not yet been described. Methods. High-resolution computed tomographic scans of 77 patients with severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were included. Torsion and anterior-posterior and right-left asymmetry of each individual vertebral body and intervertebral disc were studied from T2 to L5, using semiautomatic analysis software. True transverse sections were reconstructed along the anterior-posterior and right-left axis of all endplates. These “endplate-vectors” were calculated semiautomatically, taking rotation and tilt into account. Torsion was defined as the difference in axial rotation between 2 subsequent endplates. Asymmetry was defined as the relative anterior-posterior or right-left height difference of the discs and the vertebrae. Results. There were at least 3 times more torsion, anterior overgrowth, and coronal wedging in the discs than in the vertebrae in the thoracic as well as in the (thoraco) lumbar curves (P < 0.001). These values correlated significantly with the Cobb angle (r ≥ 0.37; P < 0.001). Anterior overgrowth and coronal asymmetry were greater in the apical regions whereas torsion was most pronounced in the transitional segments between the curves. Conclusion. The discs contribute more to 3-D deformity than the bony structures, and there is significant regional variability. This suggests an adaptive rather than an active phenomenon. Level of Evidence: 2

[1]  Michiel M. A. Janssen,et al.  The role of posteriorly directed shear loads acting on a pre-rotated growing spine: a hypothesis on the pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  L. Lenke,et al.  The Lenke Classification of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How it Organizes Curve Patterns as a Template to Perform Selective Fusions of the Spine , 2003, Spine.

[3]  E. Somerville,et al.  Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve. , 1952, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  T. Grivas,et al.  Intervertebral disc biomechanics in the pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  W. Chau,et al.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: RESULTS OF DISPROPORTIONATE ENDOCHONDRAL-MEMBRANOUS BONE GROWTH , 2003 .

[6]  Sally Roberts,et al.  The Elastic Fiber Network of the Anulus Fibrosus of the Normal and Scoliotic Human Intervertebral Disc , 2005, Spine.

[7]  Cobb,et al.  Outlines for the study of scoliosis , 1948 .

[8]  D. Hueter Anatomische Studien an den Extremitätengelenken Neugeborener und Erwachsener , 1863, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin.

[9]  M. Roth Idiopathic scoliosis from the point of view of the neuroradiologist , 1981, Neuroradiology.

[10]  R. Castelein,et al.  The Pathogenesis of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Review of the Literature , 2008, Spine.

[11]  P. Dangerfield,et al.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—result of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth? , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[12]  T. Lam,et al.  Relative Shortening and Functional Tethering of Spinal Cord in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?: Study With Multiplanar Reformat Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Somatosensory Evoked Potential , 2006, Spine.

[13]  J. V. van Dieën,et al.  The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis--a hypothesis. , 2005, Medical hypotheses.

[14]  T. Taylor,et al.  The contribution of the intervertebral disk to the scoliotic deformity. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  Vertebral Wedging Characteristic Changes in Scoliotic Spines , 2004, Spine.

[16]  Neil Roberts,et al.  Research into Spinal Deformities 9 , 2021, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.

[17]  Jacques Vidal,et al.  Mechanical Process and Growth Cartilages; Essential Factors in the Progression of Scoliosis , 1993, Spine.

[18]  P. Newton,et al.  Comparison of 3-Dimensional Spinal Reconstruction Accuracy: Biplanar Radiographs With EOS Versus Computed Tomography , 2012, Spine.

[19]  R. Dickson,et al.  The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  J. Risser,et al.  The Classic: The Iliac Apophysis: An Invaluable Sign in the Management of Scoliosis , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics.

[21]  Luke Windisch,et al.  Vertebral Height Growth Predominates Over Intervertebral Disc Height Growth in Adolescents With Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[22]  R. Porter Can a short spinal cord produce scoliosis? , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[23]  C. Nicoladoni Anatomie und mechanismus der skoliose , 1909 .

[24]  I. Stokes,et al.  Disc and vertebral wedging in patients with progressive scoliosis. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[25]  Hae-Ryong Song,et al.  Differential wedging of vertebral body and intervertebral disc in thoracic and lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis – A cross sectional study in 150 patients , 2008, Scoliosis.

[26]  R. Betz,et al.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Classification to Determine Extent of Spinal Arthrodesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  R A Dickson,et al.  Idiopathic scoliosis in three dimensions. A radiographic and morphometric analysis. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  I. Stokes,et al.  Cobb Angle Progression in Adolescent Scoliosis Begins at the Intervertebral Disc , 2009, Spine.

[29]  R Roaf,et al.  The basic anatomy of scoliosis. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  Koen L Vincken,et al.  Analysis of Preexistent Vertebral Rotation in the Normal Spine , 2006, Spine.

[31]  R. Hedlund,et al.  Radiographic changes at the coronal plane in early scoliosis. , 1994, Spine.

[32]  T. Taylor,et al.  The collagen of the intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.