Teaching Nature of Science to K‐2 Students: What understandings can they attain?

This study explored the influence of a Saturday Science program that used explicit reflective instruction through contextualized and decontextualized guided and authentic inquiry on K‐2 students’ views of nature of science (NOS). The six‐week program ran for 2.5 hours weekly and emphasized NOS in a variety of science content areas, culminating in an authentic inquiry designed and carried out by the K‐2 students. The Views of Nature of Science Form D was used to interview K‐2 students pre‐ and post‐instruction. Copies of student work were retained for content analysis. Videotapes made of each week’s science instruction were reviewed to ensure that explicit reflective NOS instruction took place. Explicit NOS teaching strategies included (1) introducing NOS through decontextualized activities, (2) embedding NOS into science content through contextualized activities, (3) using children’s literature, (4) debriefings and embedded NOS assessments, and (5) guided and student‐designed inquiries. Results indicate that K‐2 students improved their NOS views over the course of the program, suggesting that they are developmentally ready for these concepts. Students developed adequate views of the distinction between observation and inference, the creative NOS, the tentative NOS, the empirical NOS, and to a lesser degree, the subjective NOS.

[1]  R. Bogdan Qualitative research for education , 1981 .

[2]  L. Resnick The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out , 1987 .

[3]  S. Carey Cognitive science and science education. , 1986 .

[4]  Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting , 2006 .

[5]  Deborah L. Hanuscin,et al.  Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program , 2007 .

[6]  The Influence of Primary Children's Ideas in Science on Teaching Practice , 2000 .

[7]  K. Zoehfeld,et al.  What Is the World Made Of?: All About Solids, Liquids, and Gases , 1998 .

[8]  Stephen J. Farenga,et al.  Informal Science Experience, Attitudes, Future Interest in Science, and Gender of High-Ability Students: An Exploratory Study , 1999 .

[9]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[10]  Rosanne W. Fortner,et al.  Model of Affective Learning for Nonformal Science Education Facilities. , 1997 .

[11]  Tali Tal,et al.  School Visits to Natural History Museums: Teaching or Enriching?. , 2007 .

[12]  Yvonne J. Meichtry Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development , 1992 .

[13]  Kathleen E. Metz On the Complex Relation Between Cognitive Developmental Research and Children’s Science Curricula , 1997 .

[14]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science , 2000 .

[15]  Michael P. Clough Learners’ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction , 2006 .

[16]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  “How should i know what scientists do?—I am just a kid”: fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science , 2005 .

[17]  W. Whitman When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer , 2004 .

[18]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[19]  L. Ramey-gassert Learning Science beyond the Classroom , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[20]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science , 1998 .

[21]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[22]  Amy Roth McDuffie,et al.  One course is not enough : Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science , 2006 .

[23]  Kathleen E. Metz Children's Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: Their Conceptualization of Uncertainty in Investigations of Their Own Design , 2004 .

[24]  Seuss Bartholomew and the Oobleck , 1949 .

[25]  Rola Khishfe,et al.  Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science. , 2002 .

[26]  L. Resnick Learning In School and Out , 2008 .

[27]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Constraints or Guideposts? Developmental Psychology and Science Education , 1997 .

[28]  Using Action Research to Engage K-6 Teachers in Nature of Science Inquiry as Professional Development , 2010 .

[29]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  A history of ideas in science education : implications for practice , 1992 .

[30]  Kathleen E. Metz Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[31]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .