Proportional Reasoning Ability and Concepts of Scale: Surface area to volume relationships in science

The National Science Education Standards emphasise teaching unifying concepts and processes such as basic functions of living organisms, the living environment, and scale. Scale influences science processes and phenomena across the domains. One of the big ideas of scale is that of surface area to volume. This study explored whether or not there is a correlation between proportional reasoning ability and a student's ability to understand surface area to volume relationships. Students' knowledge of surface area to volume relationships was assessed pre and post to a one‐week instructional intervention involving investigations about surface area to volume as a limiting factor in biological and physical systems. Results showed that proportional reasoning scores of middle school students were correlated to pre‐test and post‐test assessment scores, and a paired‐sample t‐test found significant differences from pre‐test to post‐test for the surface area to volume assessment. Relationships between proportional reasoning, visualisation abilities and success in solving surface to volume problems are discussed. The implications of the results of this study for learning concepts such as magnitudes of things, limits to size, and properties of systems that change depending on volume and surface are explored.

[1]  A. Lawson,et al.  Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VIII: Proportional, Probabilistic, and Correlational Reasoning , 1980 .

[2]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes , 1998 .

[3]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Understanding Scale: Powers of Ten , 2007 .

[4]  D. Roff.  On Being the Right Size , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Bao-tyan Hwang,et al.  A Study of Proportional Reasoning and Self-Regulation Instruction on Students' Conceptual Change in Conceptions of Solution. , 1994 .

[6]  E. Holmes.  On being the right size , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Is the concept of conservation of volume in solids really more difficult than for liquids, or is the way we test giving us an unfair comparison? , 2006 .

[8]  The influence of object size, dimension and prior context on children's estimation abilities , 1994 .

[9]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  A cross‐age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion , 1991 .

[10]  D. Clements,et al.  STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECTANGULAR ARRAYS OF CUBES , 1996 .

[11]  George W. Bright,et al.  Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios, and Proportions: 2002 Yearbook , 2002 .

[12]  C. Mcgowan.  Diatoms to Dinosaurs: The Size and Scale of Living Things , 1994 .

[13]  J. Mathewson.  Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[14]  David Harris Russell,et al.  Children's thinking , 1956 .

[15]  Kenneth Tobin.  Patterns of reasoning: Probability , 1982 .

[16]  Pseudoconservation of the Volume and Surface Area of a Solid Object. , 1977 .

[17]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[18]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[19]  Amanda Everett,et al.  Ratio and Proportion , 2009 .

[20]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  A cross‐age study of student understanding of the concept of homeostasis , 1992 .

[21]  G. Kenny,et al.  Diffusion and Osmosis , 1995 .

[22]  Constance Kamii,et al.  Identification of Multiplicative Thinking in Children in Grades 1-5. , 1996 .

[23]  Susan J. Lamon,et al.  Ratio and Proportion: Connecting Content and Children's Thinking. , 1993 .

[24]  Paul V. Kelly,et al.  Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concepts to high school biology students , 2001 .