Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics*
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Maryellen Hamilton,et al. Goats Don't Wear Coats: An Examination of Semantic Interference in Rhyming Assessments of Reading Readiness for English Language Learners , 2006 .
[2] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] L. Ferrand,et al. Normes d'associations verbales pour 366 noms d'objets concrets , 1998 .
[4] R. Smits,et al. Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] S. Blumstein,et al. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.
[6] Mary Florentine,et al. Speech perception in noise by fluent, non‐native listeners , 1985 .
[7] M. Brysbaert,et al. The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[8] A K Nábĕlek,et al. Perception of consonants in reverberation by native and non-native listeners. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] T. Houtgast,et al. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] I H Bernstein,et al. Semantic priming: Subliminal perception or context? , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] Thomas A. Schreiber,et al. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[12] Rebecca Treiman,et al. The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[13] A. Nabelek,et al. English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] S Buus,et al. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[15] Ann R Bradlow,et al. Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] A. Boothroyd,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] T. Houtgast,et al. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] S. Blumstein,et al. Effects of subphonetic and syllable structure variation on word recognition , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[20] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[21] W. M. Rabinowitz,et al. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.