Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics*

Bilinguals are better able to perceive speech-in-noise in their native compared to their non-native language. This benefit is thought to be due to greater use of higher-level, linguistic context in the native language. Previous studies showing this have used sentences and do not allow us to determine which level of language contributes to this context benefit. Here, we used a new paradigm that isolates the semantic level of speech, in both languages of bilinguals. Results revealed that in the native language, a semantically related target word facilitates the perception of a previously presented degraded prime word relative to when a semantically unrelated target follows the prime, suggesting a specific contribution of semantics to the native language context benefit. We also found the reverse in the non-native language, where there was a disadvantage of semantic context on word recognition, suggesting that such top–down, contextual information results in semantic interference in one's second language.

[1]  Maryellen Hamilton,et al.  Goats Don't Wear Coats: An Examination of Semantic Interference in Rhyming Assessments of Reading Readiness for English Language Learners , 2006 .

[2]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L. Ferrand,et al.  Normes d'associations verbales pour 366 noms d'objets concrets , 1998 .

[4]  R. Smits,et al.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.

[6]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Speech perception in noise by fluent, non‐native listeners , 1985 .

[7]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[8]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  Perception of consonants in reverberation by native and non-native listeners. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Semantic priming: Subliminal perception or context? , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[13]  A. Nabelek,et al.  English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S Buus,et al.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of subphonetic and syllable structure variation on word recognition , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[21]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.