Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems

As the significance of public opinion and practice for energy system change has become more widely understood, an expanding body of work is investigating drivers of social and public acceptance of a wide diversity of energy technologies, both infrastructure and end-user applications. The literature is large and spans multiple contexts, methods, theoretical and disciplinary perspectives and paradigms. While this diversity is in many ways healthy, experience suggests that it can be confusing for those without close knowledge of its constituent parts. Here we set out a framework for thinking about energy technology ‘acceptance’ that is relatively neutral in normative and theoretical terms, while acknowledging that a full integration of perspectives and complete theoretical neutrality are not possible. We do not claim a comprehensive review base, but draw on our experience to illustrate the diversity of what we regard as the more influential perspectives in the literature.

[1]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options , 2009 .

[2]  Bart W. Terwel,et al.  Competence‐Based and Integrity‐Based Trust as Predictors of Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  B. Sovacool What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[4]  L. Steg,et al.  Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior , 2008 .

[5]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[7]  André Faaij,et al.  Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[8]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: a Critical Review , 2007 .

[9]  Peter Simmons,et al.  Living with Nuclear Power: A Q‐Method Study of Local Community Perceptions , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line , 2013 .

[11]  Robert L. Shrigley,et al.  Effects of knowledge and persuasion on high‐school students' attitudes toward nuclear power plants , 1995 .

[12]  Erik Allardt,et al.  Challenges for Comparative Social Research , 1990 .

[13]  Steven E. Jones Against Technology: From the Luddites to Neo-Luddism , 2006 .

[14]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[15]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[16]  Paul Upham,et al.  Public Attitudes to and Engagement with Low-Carbon Energy , 2011 .

[17]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Undesired reinforcement of harmful ‘self-evident truths’ concerning the implementation of wind power , 2012 .

[18]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Multiple Models to Inform Climate Change Policy: A Pragmatic Response to the ‘Beyond the ABC’ Debate , 2011 .

[19]  Sampsa Hyysalo,et al.  User innovation in sustainable home energy technologies , 2013 .

[20]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[21]  Donald J. Falconer,et al.  The Key to the Mixed Method Dilemma , 1999 .

[22]  P. Upham,et al.  Public perceptions of CCS: Emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications , 2011 .

[23]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[24]  J. Mahoney Toward a Unified Theory of Causality , 2008 .

[25]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[26]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology? , 2006, Nature nanotechnology.

[27]  N. Allum,et al.  Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .

[28]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The Role of Behavioural Economics in Energy and Climate Policy , 2011 .

[29]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  Acceptance of Agile Methodologies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Stephen Gorard,et al.  Towards a judgement‐based statistical analysis , 2006 .

[31]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives , 2006 .

[32]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops , 2005 .

[33]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Defrosting the Freezer: From Novelty to Convenience , 2000 .

[34]  P.J.M. Verschuren Holism versus Reductionism in Modern Social Science Research , 2001 .

[35]  Salvatore Ruggiero,et al.  Realizing the social acceptance of community renewable energy: a process-outcome analysis of stakeholder influence , 2016 .

[36]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Informed Public Preferences for Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other Low‐Carbon Technologies , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[38]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Public Attitudes to Environmental Change -a selective review of theory and practice, report for ESRC/LWEC , 2009 .

[39]  P. Devine‐Wright Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[40]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement , 2010 .

[41]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Personal carbon trading: Notional concept or workable proposition? Exploring theoretical, ideological and practical underpinnings , 2007 .

[42]  Paul Upham,et al.  Public Responses to Co2 Storage Sites: Lessons from Five European Cases , 2012 .

[43]  Paul Hoyningen-Huene,et al.  Paul Feyerabend und Thomas Kuhn , 2002 .

[44]  Aidan O'Driscoll,et al.  Consumer awareness in the adoption of microgeneration technologies An empirical investigation in the Republic of Ireland , 2010 .

[45]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Public Engagement in Planning for Renewable Energy , 2009 .

[46]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours , 2010 .

[47]  P. Devine‐Wright Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review , 2007 .

[48]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  The distinctiveness of case-oriented research. , 1999, Health services research.

[49]  Emeli Adell,et al.  ACCEPTANCE OF DRIVER SUPPORT SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[50]  Edward N. Zalta,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A Developed Dynamic Reference Work , 2002 .

[51]  Paul Upham,et al.  Public attitudes, understanding, and engagement in relation to low-carbon energy. A selective review of academic and non-academic literatures : report for RCUK Energy Programme , 2011 .

[52]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[53]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  The effect of figures in CCS communication , 2013 .

[54]  Jeroen Van Bouwel,et al.  Explanatory Strategies Beyond the Individualism/Holism Debate , 2014 .

[55]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[56]  Paul Upham,et al.  Local public opinion of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass gasifier in Devon: questionnaire survey results. , 2007 .

[57]  Paul Upham,et al.  Energy governance and UK bioenergy , 2010 .

[58]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[59]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems , 1981 .

[60]  Stephen Gorard,et al.  Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft , 2010 .

[61]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[62]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[63]  Linda Steg,et al.  Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda , 2014 .

[64]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[65]  Roger Williams,et al.  Public acceptance of new technologies. An international review , 1986 .

[66]  L. Lutzenhiser Social and Behavioral Aspects of Energy use , 1993 .

[67]  I. Bailey,et al.  Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: A cultural theory approach , 2010 .

[68]  Andrew McMeekin,et al.  International Review of Behaviour Change Initiatives , 2011 .

[69]  G. Assefa,et al.  Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies , 2007 .

[70]  Claus Michelsen,et al.  Consumer awareness in the adoption of microgeneration technologies , 2010 .

[71]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Automatic Mental Associations Predict Future Choices of Undecided Decision-Makers , 2008, Science.

[72]  Matt Rogers Contextualizing Theories and Practices of Bricolage Research , 2012 .

[73]  E. Shove Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[74]  David J. Hart,et al.  Greening London's black cabs: a study of driver's preferences for fuel cell taxis , 2004 .

[75]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain , 2008 .

[76]  Stephen Gorard,et al.  Can we overcome the methodological schism? Four models for combining qualitative and quantitative evidence , 2002 .

[77]  Paul Upham,et al.  Public perceptions of CCS in context: Results of NearCO2 focus groups in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain and Poland , 2011 .

[78]  E. Shove,et al.  Comfort in a lower carbon society , 2008 .

[79]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK , 2007 .

[80]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[81]  Paula Castro,et al.  Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: contributions from the social representations approach , 2006 .

[82]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[83]  A. Warde Consumption and Theories of Practice , 2005 .

[84]  Carroll Pursell,et al.  Beyond Engineering: How Society Shapes Technology , 1999 .

[85]  Paul Upham,et al.  Stakeholder opinion of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for bioenergy planning and policy , 2006 .

[86]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Climate Change or Social Change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond Disciplines , 2011 .

[87]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[88]  J. Gil,et al.  Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy , 2008 .

[89]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[90]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Nudge nudge, think think: Two strategies for changing civic behaviour , 2009 .

[91]  Paul Upham,et al.  A communications theory approach to project planning for carbon capture and storage , 2011 .

[92]  Elisabeth Dütschke,et al.  Communicating CCS: Applying communications theory to public perceptions of carbon capture and storage , 2011 .

[93]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Sociology in a Changing Climate , 2010 .

[94]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Economic Sociology and the Social Problem of Energy Inefficiency , 2007 .

[95]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[96]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence , 2008 .

[97]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[98]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[99]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[100]  E. Hobman,et al.  Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour , 2015 .

[101]  David Toke,et al.  Explaining wind power planning outcomes:: some findings from a study in England and Wales , 2005 .

[102]  Emmy Bergsma,et al.  Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[103]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[104]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[105]  Engelbert L. Schucking,et al.  Einstein: His Life and Universe , 2007 .

[106]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[107]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Communication of CCS monitoring activities may not have a reassuring effect on the public , 2011 .

[108]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[109]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[110]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance , 2011 .

[111]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[112]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[113]  Geoffrey Binder,et al.  Can psychological and practice theory approaches to environmental sustainability be integrated , 2013 .

[114]  M. Hitzeroth,et al.  Renewable Energy Projects: Acceptance Risks and Their Management , 2013 .