Evaluation of three commercial tick removal tools

OBJECTIVE To evaluate three commercially available tick removal tools against medium-tipped nontissue tweezers. METHODS We evaluated three commercially available tick removal tools against medium-tipped tweezers. Three inexperienced users randomly removed attached American dog ticks (Dermacentor variabilis Say) and lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum L.) from laboratory rabbits in a university animal facility using all tools during one removal session. RESULTS Tick damage occurring from removal and quantity of attachment cement were compared. No tool removed nymphs without damage and all tools removed adults of both species successfully. American dog ticks proved easier to remove than lone star ticks, whose mouthparts often remained in the skin. CONCLUSIONS Nymphal ticks were consistently removed more successfully with commercial tools when compared with tweezers but with more difficulty than adults were removed. The commercial tick removal tools tested are functional for removal of nymphs and adults and should be considered as viable alternatives to medium-tipped tweezers.

[1]  J. Gray,et al.  Risk of infection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato for a host in relation to the duration of nymphal Ixodes ricinus feeding and the method of tick removal. , 1998, Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie : international journal of medical microbiology.

[2]  K. Arndt,et al.  Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology , 1996 .

[3]  R. Lane,et al.  Transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi by Ixodes pacificus nymphs and reservoir competence of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) infected by tick-bite. , 1995, The Journal of parasitology.

[4]  M. D. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of subcutaneous injection of local anesthetic agents as a method of tick removal. , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[5]  R. Boer,et al.  Removal of attached nymphs and adults of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) , 1993 .

[6]  C. Vahrenholz,et al.  Incidence of bladder cancer in a cohort of workers exposed to 4-chloro-o-toluidine while synthesising chlordimeform. , 1992, British journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  G. Maupin,et al.  Duration of adult female Ixodes dammini attachment and transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi, with description of a needle aspiration isolation method. , 1991, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[8]  A. Spielman,et al.  Duration of tick attachment and Borrelia burgdorferi transmission , 1987, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  L. P. Kammholz.  Variation on tick removal. , 1986, Pediatrics.

[10]  G. Needham.  Evaluation of five popular methods for tick removal. , 1985, Pediatrics.

[11]  C. Saunders.  Current Emergency Diagnosis & Treatment , 1985 .

[12]  A. B. Smith,et al.  Relation between surgical volume and postoperative wound infection. , 1984, The Western journal of medicine.

[13]  Sherman Wt.  Polishing off ticks. , 1983 .

[14]  A. Spielman,et al.  Human babesiosis on Nantucket Island: prevalence of Babesia microti in ticks. , 1980, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[15]  W. Burgdorfer,et al.  Tick-borne diseases in the United States: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and Colorado tick fever. A review. , 1977, Acta tropica.

[16]  R. O. Drummond,et al.  Chlordimeform: a detachment-stimulating chemical for three-host ticks. , 1974, Journal of medical entomology.

[17]  C. Taylor,et al.  Studies on the removal of embedded lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum. , 1962 .