‘Learning to assess’ and ‘assessing to learn’: the construction of knowledge about Assistive Technology

A key role in the development and deployment of Assistive Technology solutions is that of the ‘assessor‐consultant’. Assessor‐consultants for the UK‐based charity Abilitynet work with clients to develop customized computer‐based assistive technology systems and draw on a range of shared knowledge from the assessor‐consultant community. We provide examples of the process by which assessor‐consultants develop systems for clients with complex difficulties and progressive conditions such as motor neurone disease. We draw attention to the fact that evaluation studies of interventions consist largely of generic findings that are difficult to apply in assessor‐consultants’ everyday work with clients. Analysis of case histories and interviews with experienced assessor‐consultants suggests that reconstructing their work as a knowledge construction activity could form the basis of a shared and collaborative culture of practitioner research. We draw on recent work on knowledge construction and innovation to suggest possible means by which this might be supported.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  L. Stenhouse.  An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[3]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[4]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[5]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[6]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[8]  Deciphering chronic pain , 1992 .

[9]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[10]  Sherry Perdue Casali,et al.  A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method , 1995 .

[11]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems , 1997 .

[12]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[13]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[14]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[15]  Stephen Toulmin.  Perspectives on activity theory: Knowledge as shared procedures , 1999 .

[16]  Nicholas M. Allix.  Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .

[17]  Sami Paavola,et al.  Epistemological foundations for CSCL: a comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities , 2002, CSCL.

[18]  B. Weiner,et al.  The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Jutai,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[20]  M. Scherer.  The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  Y. Engeström,et al.  The Discursive Construction of Collaborative Care , 2003 .

[22]  Velda McCune,et al.  Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of University Teaching-Learning Environments : Concepts , Measures and Preliminary Findings , 2003 .

[23]  K. Hakkarainen,et al.  Communities of Networked Expertise: Professional and Educational Perspectives , 2004 .

[24]  H. Altrichter.  The role of the ‘professional community’ in action research , 2005 .

[25]  P. Hodkinson,et al.  Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning , 2005 .

[26]  P. Benson,et al.  Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An enquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publications. , 2006 .