Holistic Processing of Faces: Learning Effects with Mooney Faces

The specialness of faces is seen in the face inversion effect, which disrupts the configural, but not the analytic, processing of faces. Mooney faces, which are processed holistically, allowed us to determine the contribution of holistic processing to the face inversion effect. As inverted Mooney faces are difficult to recognize as faces, we also included an intermediary training period for Mooney face recognition for half of the subjects. Early face-sensitive ERPs (N170 and P1) and P2 were measured. Behavioral data showed an increase in correct responses to inverted and upright Mooney faces after the learning phase for the experimental group. No effects were seen on P1. N170 latency did not vary with stimulus type before the intermediary phase, however, N170 amplitude was consistently larger for upright than inverted Mooney faces. After the intermediary exercise, N170 was delayed for inverted compared to upright Mooney faces. In contrast, for both groups of subjects P2 amplitude was larger for nonface stimuli, and P2 amplitude decreased after the intermediate task only for the subjects trained to recognize Mooney faces. As the usual inversion effect seen with photographic faces (delayed and larger N170) was not seen with Mooney faces, these data suggest that this effect on N170 is due to the recruitment of analytic processing. P2 reflected learning and a deeper processing of the stimuli that were not identifiable as faces.

[1]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face processing stages: Impact of difficulty and the separation of effects , 2006, Brain Research.

[4]  B. Renault,et al.  Face and shape repetition effects in humans: a spatio‐temporal ERP study , 1997, Neuroreport.

[5]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[9]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[10]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[11]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG , 2006, Brain Research.

[15]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[16]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[18]  C. M. Mooney.  Age in the development of closure ability in children. , 1957, Canadian journal of psychology.

[19]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[20]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[21]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[23]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Visual object recognition. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[27]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  F. Michèl,et al.  [Are the lesions responsible for prosopagnosia always bilateral?]. , 1989, Revue neurologique.

[29]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  D. Purcell,et al.  The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  T. Allison,et al.  Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers, and colors. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[36]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[37]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[38]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Brain Imaging , 2003, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[39]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[40]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[41]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[42]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[43]  Margot J. Taylor.  Non-spatial attentional effects on P1 , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[45]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  D. Jeffreys.  Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing , 1996 .

[48]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.