Sorption-enhanced methanol synthesis: Dynamic modeling and optimization

Abstract Owing to the global energy concerns in today's world, alternative fuels such as methanol have become an increasingly attractive option to meet the growing power demand. This work considers a dynamic mathematical model of a gas-flowing solids-fixed bed reactor (GFSFBR) with in situ water adsorption for methanol synthesis in the face of long term catalyst deactivation. Contact of gas and fine solid particles inside packed bed results in the selective adsorption of water from the methanol synthesis that leads to higher methanol production compared to the conventional methanol reactor (CMR). Moreover, a theoretical investigation has been performed in order to evaluate the optimal operating conditions and maximize the methanol production in a GFSFBR using differential evolution (DE) algorithm as a robust method. Dynamic optimization result has shown that under optimum values of inlet temperature of gas phase, inlet temperature of flowing solid phase, and inlet temperature of shell side the highest methanol production can be achieved during the operating period.

[1]  L. Russo,et al.  Temperature and conversion patterns in a network of catalytic reactors for methanol synthesis with different switch strategies , 2010 .

[2]  W. Ranz.  Evaporation from drops : Part II , 1952 .

[3]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Methanol synthesis via sorption-enhanced reaction process: Modeling and multi-objective optimization , 2014 .

[4]  Erasmo Mancusi,et al.  Control of temperature wave trains in periodically forced networks of catalytic reactors for methanol synthesis , 2013 .

[5]  Aacm Beenackers,et al.  Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis , 1990 .

[6]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Dynamic modelling of a three-phase catalytic slurry reactor , 2001 .

[7]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[8]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Modified differential evolution (MDE) for optimization of non-linear chemical processes , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[9]  Payam Parvasi,et al.  Dynamic modeling and optimization of a novel methanol synthesis loop with hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor , 2009 .

[10]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[11]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Methanol synthesis in a novel axial-flow, spherical packed bed reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation , 2011 .

[12]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Enhancement of methanol production in a novel fluidized-bed hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation , 2009 .

[13]  N. Nikačević,et al.  Enhanced ammonia synthesis in multifunctional reactor with in situ adsorption , 2011 .

[14]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Numerical Optimization of Computer Models , 1982 .

[15]  Marko Šetinc,et al.  Dynamics of a mixed slurry reactor for the three-phase methanol synthesis , 2001 .

[16]  W. V. Swaaij,et al.  Hydrodynamic behaviour of a gas—solid counter-current packed column at trickle flow , 1979 .

[17]  K. R. Westerterp,et al.  Two new methanol converters , 1988 .

[18]  Klaas R. Westerterp,et al.  Methanol synthesis in a countercurrent gas-solid-solid trickle flow reactor. An experimental study , 1987 .

[19]  A. Erdem-Senatalar,et al.  Optimization of the cycle durations of adsorption heat pumps employing zeolite coatings synthesized on metal supports , 2000 .

[20]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  A comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous dynamic models for industrial methanol reactors in the presence of catalyst deactivation , 2005 .

[21]  F. Kapteijn,et al.  Water vapour separation from permanent gases by a zeolite-4A membrane , 2005 .

[22]  Payam Parvasi,et al.  Dynamic optimization of a novel radial-flow, spherical-bed methanol synthesis reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation using Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm , 2009 .

[23]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[24]  J. M. Smith.  Chemical Engineering Kinetics , 1980 .

[25]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  A comparison of co-current and counter-current modes of operation for a dual-type industrial methanol reactor , 2008 .

[26]  W. E. Ranz,et al.  Evaporation from drops , 1952 .

[27]  Lucia Russo,et al.  Multiplicities of temperature wave trains in periodically forced networks of catalytic reactors for reversible exothermic reactions , 2011 .

[28]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Sorption-enhanced dimethyl ether synthesis—Multiscale reactor modeling , 2011 .

[29]  O. N. Kabanova,et al.  Kinetics of the desorption of water vapors from molded zeolites, types A and X , 1966 .

[30]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Enhancement of methanol production in a novel cascading fluidized-bed hydrogen permselective membrane methanol reactor , 2010 .

[31]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[32]  Je-Lueng Shie,et al.  Synthesis of alcohols and alkanes over potassium and vanadium promoted molybdenum carbides , 2012 .

[33]  D. Do,et al.  Adsorption analysis : equilibria and kinetics , 1998 .

[34]  Majid Baniadam,et al.  Incorporation of Flexibility in the Design of a Methanol Synthesis Loop in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation , 2003 .

[35]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Hydrogen/methanol production in a novel multifunctional reactor with in situ adsorption: modeling and optimization , 2014 .

[36]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[37]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  China's growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment , 2012 .

[38]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Differential evolution strategies for optimal design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers , 2007 .