Integrating Action Research and System Dynamics: Towards a Generic Process Design for Participative Modelling

The process of building system dynamics models ranges from linear iterative phases to the circular iterative phases. However, while all these process designs are well known and explicit to system dynamics modellers, they are not comprehensive for participative modelling involving clients/participants without prior modelling knowledge. This paper presents a detailed modelling process design of six phases from the prevalent system dynamics modelling literature. By clearly showing activities and outcomes of each phase, the paper posits that the purpose and benefits of participative modelling are entailed within the phases and not necessarily by the outcomes only. A new phase called action planning, derived from action research process is used to emphasise clients' contribution in participative modelling. The interplay of the six phases during modelling results into three cycles namely; problem articulation cycle, modelling proficiency cycle, and solution refinement cycle, all of which address the diversity and legitimacy of contributions by all parties.

[1]  Francis Y. Lau,et al.  Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[2]  John Kizito,et al.  MAKERERE UNIVERSITY TOWARDS 2017 STRATEGIC CHOICES , 2007 .

[3]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Model-building for group decision support: Issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation , 1992 .

[4]  P. Checkland From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[5]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[6]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model‐building to facilitate organizational change: an exploratory study , 1996 .

[7]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Lessons from system dynamics modeling , 1987 .

[8]  Andreas Größler,et al.  System Dynamics Projects That Failed to Make an Impact , 2007 .

[9]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[10]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[11]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Developing a logistics strategy through participative business modelling , 1995 .

[12]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Scripts for group model building , 1997 .

[13]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[14]  M. Mamdani Scholars in the Marketplace. The Dilemmas of Neo-Liberal Reform at Makerere University, 1989-2005 , 2007 .

[15]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[16]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Group model building: adding more science to the craft , 1997 .

[17]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Clients' opinions on group model-building : an exploratory study , 1997 .

[18]  Aldo A. Zagonel,et al.  MODEL CONCEPTUALIZATION IN GROUP MODEL BUILDING : A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE EXPLORING THE TENSION BETWEEN REPRESENTING REALITY AND NEGOTIATING A SOCIAL ORDER , 2002 .

[19]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Alexander Zock,et al.  A critical review of the use of System Dynamics for organizational consultation projects , 2004 .

[21]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Action research and system dynamics: can they benefit from each other? , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[22]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[23]  Alberto Paucar-Caceres,et al.  An application of Soft Systems Dynamics Methodology (SSDM) , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling☆ , 1992 .

[25]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model-building: tackling messy problems , 1999 .

[26]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Testing the snake river explorer , 1996 .

[28]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..