Some theory of reference values. I. Stratified (categorized) normal ranges and a method for following an individual's clinical laboratory values.

The conventional population-based normal range has recently been shown to be a generally defective reference criterion for assessing individual laboratory test results. Applying a previously derived formula to published data, we find that the use of age-, sex-specific normal ranges may fail to produce a substantial improvement in sensitivity over nonspecific ranges, even when age-sex differences in mean values are statistically significant. This occurs when the difference in means is not accompanied by a sufficient reduction in the variation among individuals within a given class. Turning therefore to comparison of an individual's current measurement with his own previous value(s), I suggest a simple statistical model that leads to sequential testing of each new observation against an exponentially weighted moving average of previous results. Estimates of biological and analytical components of variance are required. The ability of this method to detect trends in very short series is explored with the aid of computer-simulated laboratory data. A sample of these data is also used to illustrate the application of these estimation and testing procedures by means of a graph.

[1]  P. Winkel,et al.  Factors contributing to intra-individual variation of serum constituents: 3. Use of randomized duplicate serum specimens to evaluate sources of analytical error. , 1974, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  E. K. Harris.  Effects of intra- and interindividual variation on the appropriate use of normal ranges. , 1974, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  E. K. Harris,et al.  Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. II. Estimating biological components of variation. , 1971, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  P. Winkel,et al.  Factors contributing to intra-individual variation of serum constituents: 5. Short-term day-to-day and within-hour variation of serum constituents in healthy subjects. , 1974, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  J. Muth.  Optimal Properties of Exponentially Weighted Forecasts , 1960 .

[6]  A. H. Reed,et al.  Estimation of normal ranges from a controlled sample survey. I. Sex- and age-related influence on the SMA 12-60 screening group of tests. , 1972, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  P. Wilding,et al.  Patterns of change for various biochemical constituents detected in well population screening. , 1972, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[8]  Kirkland B. Stewart.  A New Weighted Average , 1970 .

[9]  M. Werner,et al.  Influence of Sex and Age on the Normal Range of Eleven Serum Constituents , 1970, Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[10]  B. Saravanos,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data , 2008 .

[11]  Frank E. Grubbs,et al.  Operating Characteristics for the Common Statistical Tests of Significance , 1946 .