Prediction of Effective Post-Operative Epidural Anesthesia Using Hemodynamic Changes Detected by Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM)

Background: Epidural anesthesia after abdominal surgery results in improved postoperative pain relief but has up to a 30% failure rate. Hemodynamic changes after epidural administration of local anesthetics may provide parameters to predict dermatomal blockade and effective pain control in the postoperative period. The Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM) provides continuous measurements of stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). We hypothesized that the changes in hemodynamic parameters measured by the ECOM monitor along with changes in systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) would predict effective epidural anesthesia. Methods: 19 patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery were enrolled. After placement of an epidural catheter and establishment of general anesthesia hemodynamics were recorded in 15-minute intervals using the ECOM monitor. At the start of abdominal closure epidural catheters were loaded with two 5 ml boluses of 0.25% bupivacaine in ten-minute intervals. Hemodynamic parameters where then recorded at five-minute intervals until conclusion of surgery. The number of dermatomes blocked, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores, average 24-hour pain scores, and patient satisfaction were recorded.Results: Significant reduction was observed in SBP, DBP, MAP and in SVR, and increases were seen in CO and CI after starting epidural anesthesia. From the parameters measured, only a significant reduction of SVR accompanied with higher level of dermatomes blocked, and lower average 24-hour pain scores. At the sane time patients without significant SVR change had relatively low pain scores, high patient satisfaction and required the same amount of pain medications. Conclusion: Changes in SVR detected by the ECOM monitor might help to predict an effective epidural system but its clinical relevance needs to be further evaluated.

[1]  Timothy M. Maus,et al.  Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor. , 2011, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[2]  Fiona Duncan Prospective observational study of postoperative epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery. , 2011, Journal of clinical nursing.

[3]  G. Niraj,et al.  Comparison of analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[4]  W. Culp,et al.  Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. , 2010, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[5]  T. Gordh,et al.  Testing whether the epidural works: too time consuming? , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  Wei Zhao,et al.  [The hemodynamic effects during thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing major abdominal operations]. , 2009, Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery].

[7]  S. Mercadante,et al.  A Randomized-Controlled Study of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Thoracic Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Cancer Surgery , 2008, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[8]  C. Ori,et al.  Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in liver resection and living donor hepatectomy. , 2008, Transplantation proceedings.

[9]  H. Ackermann,et al.  Impact of high thoracic epidural anesthesia on incidence of perioperative atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass grafting: a prospective randomized study. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  O. Winsö,et al.  Dopamine or norepinephrine infusion during thoracic epidural anesthesia? Differences in hemodynamic effects and plasma catecholamine levels , 2005, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  M. Topsakal,et al.  General Anesthesia versus Epidural and General Anesthesia in Radical Cystectomy , 2005, Urologia Internationalis.

[12]  Å. Rudin,et al.  Pain relief and safety after major surgery A prospective study of epidural and intravenous analgesia in 2696 patients , 2003, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  Shinji Takahashi,et al.  Evaluation of the Arrow Flex Tip Plus™ epidural catheter tip position and migration during continuous thoracic analgesia , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[14]  P. Myles,et al.  Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[15]  C. Mann,et al.  Comparison of Intravenous or Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia in the Elderly after Major Abdominal Surgery , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[16]  A. Wallace,et al.  Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[17]  L. Ready,et al.  Acute Pain: Lessons Learned From 25,000 Patients , 1999, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[18]  F. Wegener,et al.  Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Audit of 1062 Patients , 1998, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[19]  B. Silbert,et al.  Combined General and Epidural Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia for Major Abdominal Surgery: Postanesthesia Recovery Characteristics , 1997, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.