Computing the scatter component of mammographic images

The authors build upon a technical report (Tech. Report OUEL 2009/93, Engng. Sci., Oxford Uni., Oxford, UK, 1993) in which they proposed a model of the mammographic imaging process for which scattered radiation is a key degrading factor. Here, the authors propose a way of estimating the scatter component of the signal at any pixel within a mammographic image, and they use this estimate for model-based image enhancement. The first step is to extend the authors' previous model to divide breast tissue into "interesting" (fibrous/glandular/cancerous) tissue and fat. The scatter model is then based on the idea that the amount of scattered radiation reaching a point is related to the energy imparted to the surrounding neighbourhood. This complex relationship is approximated using published empirical data, and it varies with the size of the breast being imaged. The approximation is further complicated by needing to take account of extra-focal radiation and breast edge effects. The approximation takes the form of a weighting mask which is convolved with the total signal (primary and scatter) to give a value which is input to a "scatter function", approximated using three reference cases, and which returns a scatter estimate. Given a scatter estimate, the more important primary component can be calculated and used to create an image recognizable by a radiologist. The images resulting from this process are clearly enhanced, and model verification tests based on an estimate of the thickness of interesting tissue present proved to be very successful. A good scatter model opens the was for further processing to remove the effects of other degrading factors, such as beam hardening.

[1]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  D R Dance,et al.  X-ray transmission formula for antiscatter grids. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Coherent scatter in diagnostic radiology. , 1983, Medical physics.

[4]  H Bernstein,et al.  On the significance of very small angle scattered radiation to radiographic imaging at low energies. , 1983, Medical physics.

[5]  K L Lam,et al.  Effects of x-ray beam equalization on mammographic imaging. , 1990, Medical physics.

[6]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[7]  K Doi,et al.  Digital Mammography: ROC Studies of the Effects of Pixel Size and Unsharp-Mask Filtering on the Detection of Subtle Microcalcifications , 1987 .

[8]  D. Dance,et al.  Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Scatter-glare correction using a convolution algorithm with variable weighting. , 1987, Medical physics.

[10]  I A Brezovich,et al.  The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography. , 1978, Radiology.

[11]  J A Seibert,et al.  X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution. , 1988, Medical physics.

[12]  D R Dance,et al.  The computation of scatter in mammography by Monte Carlo methods. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H Bernstein,et al.  Experimental and theoretical energy and angular dependencies of scattered radiation in the mammography energy range. , 1983, Medical physics.