Integrating the cold load pickup effect of reserve supplying demand response resource in social cost minimization based system scheduling

Expansion of smart grids and aggregator business facilitates the utilization of reserve supplying demand response (RSDR) resources. One of the loads that are increasingly used for reserve provision is air-conditioning load (ACL) that have cold load pickup (CLPU) or “payback” characteristics. With larger scale utilization of RSDR resources, as an effect of increasing DR aggregation business, CLPU characteristics of ACL can affect system optimal operation. Actual utilization time and duration of RSDR resources are probabilistic and affected by system scheduling and contingency occurrence. Therefore the CLPU effect of RSDR resources is probabilistic. This creates extra burden on the system reliability maintenance that should be considered from social cost minimization point of view. This complexity is addressed in this paper by modeling the extra expected load not supplied (ELNS) that the probabilistic CLPU of RSDR can impose on system. Then the aggregated RSDR resources, with CLPU characteristics, are integrated into day-ahead simultaneous system scheduling with the objective function of social cost minimization. This study showed that CLPU can have considerable effects on system scheduling and RSDR effectiveness. The proposed method of this paper proved to be useful for reducing the negative effects of CLPU while using RSDR resources.

[1]  M. Ortega-Vazquez,et al.  Optimizing the Spinning Reserve Requirements Using a Cost/Benefit Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Brendan Kirby Demand Response For Power System Reliability: FAQ , 2006 .

[3]  Jay Zarnikau,et al.  Demand participation in the restructured Electric Reliability Council of Texas market , 2010 .

[4]  Hideharu Sugihara,et al.  Analysis of optimal spinning reserve procurement with demand response resources under social cost minimization , 2011 .

[5]  M. Kintner-Meyer,et al.  Loads Providing Ancillary Services: Review of International Experience , 2008 .

[6]  P. Cappers,et al.  Demand Response in U.S. Electricity Markets: Empirical Evidence , 2010 .

[7]  J. Oyarzabal,et al.  A Direct Load Control Model for Virtual Power Plant Management , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  B. J. Kirby,et al.  Spinning Reserve From Responsive Loads , 2003 .

[9]  F. Galiana,et al.  Demand-side reserve offers in joint energy/reserve electricity markets , 2003 .

[10]  Tai-Lang Jong,et al.  A Novel Direct Air-Conditioning Load Control Method , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Kazem Zare,et al.  Demand bidding construction for a large consumer through a hybrid IGDT-probability methodology , 2010 .

[12]  Shi-Jie Deng,et al.  Mean-risk efficient portfolio analysis of demand response and supply resources , 2009 .

[13]  Jose Medina,et al.  Demand Response and Distribution Grid Operations: Opportunities and Challenges , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Masood Parvania,et al.  Demand Response Scheduling by Stochastic SCUC , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Ernesto Kofman,et al.  Load management: Model-based control of aggregate power for populations of thermostatically controlled loads , 2012 .

[16]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[17]  Yann-Chang Huang,et al.  Integrating direct load control with interruptible load management to provide instantaneous reserves for ancillary services , 2004 .

[18]  R. Adapa,et al.  Scheduling direct load control to minimize system operation cost , 1995 .

[19]  Hideharu Sugihara,et al.  Effect of optimal spinning reserve requirement on system pollution emission considering reserve supplying demand response in the electricity market , 2011 .

[20]  C. Goldman,et al.  Option value of electricity demand response , 2005 .

[21]  Qiuwei Wu,et al.  Direct Load Control (DLC) Considering Nodal Interrupted Energy Assessment Rate (NIEAR) in Restructured Power Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Nanming Chen,et al.  Air conditioner direct load control by multi-pass dynamic programming , 1995 .

[23]  A. Yousefi,et al.  A probabilistic risk-based approach for spinning reserve provision using day-ahead demand response program , 2010 .

[24]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Fostering economic demand response in the Midwest ISO , 2010 .

[25]  Lorna A. Greening,et al.  Demand response resources: Who is responsible for implementation in a deregulated market? , 2010 .