Abstract The Devonian carbonates of the Duperow Formation on the western flank of the Williston Basin in southwest Saskatchewan contain natural accumulations of CO2, and may have done so for as long as 50 million years. These carbonate sediments are characterized by a succession of carbonate cycles capped by anhydrite-rich evaporites that are thought to act as seals to fluid migration. The Weyburn CO2 injection site lies 400 km to the east in a series of Mississippian carbonates that were deposited in a similar depositional environment. That long-term isolation of natural CO2 can be accomplished within carbonate strata has motivated the investigation of the Duperow rocks as a potential natural analog for storage of anthropogenic CO2 in carbonate lithologies. For the Duperow strata to represent a legitimate analog for Midale injection and storage, the similarity in lithofacies, whole rock compositions, mineral compositions and porosity with the Midale Beds must be established. Here we compare lithofacies, whole rock compositions, mineralogy and mineral compositions from both locales. The major mineral phases at both locales are calcite, dolomite and anhydrite. In addition, accessory pyrite, fluorite, quartz and celestine (strontium sulfate) are also observed. Dawsonite, a potential CO2-trapping mineral, is not observed within the CO2-bearing horizons of the Duperow Formation, however. The distribution of porosity in the Midale Vuggy units is similar to that of the Duperow Formation, but the Marly units of the Midale have significantly higher porosity. The Duperow Formation is topped by the Dinesmore evaporite that is rich in anhydrite, and often contains authigenic K-feldspar. The chemistry of dolomite and calcite from the two localities also overlaps. Silicate minerals are in low abundance ( Durocher et al., 2003 ), but the paucity of mono- and divalent cations that can be derived from dissolution of these silicate minerals likely precludes significant carbonate mineral formation. Hence, physical and solution trapping are likely to be the primary CO2 trapping mechanisms at both sites.
[1]
J. Rutqvist,et al.
Seismic rupture and ground accelerations induced by CO2 injection in the shallow crust
,
2012
.
[2]
K. A. Goebel.
Paleogeographic Setting of Late Devonian to Early Mississippian Transition from Passive to Collisional Margin, Antler Foreland, Eastern Nevada and Western Utah
,
1991
.
[3]
P. Aagaard,et al.
Why is Dawsonite Absent in CO2 Charged Reservoirs
,
2011
.
[4]
J. Rutqvist,et al.
Modeling of coupled deformation and permeability evolution during fault reactivation induced by deep underground injection of CO2
,
2011
.
[5]
Sigurdur R. Gislason,et al.
Mineral Carbonation of CO2
,
2008
.
[6]
Barbara Sherwood Lollar,et al.
Solubility trapping in formation water as dominant CO2 sink in natural gas fields
,
2009,
Nature.
[7]
R. F. Marvin,et al.
Radiometric Ages of Intrusive Rocks in the Little Belt Mountains, Montana
,
1973
.
[8]
A. Navarre‐Sitchler,et al.
Supercritical carbon dioxide and sulfur in the Madison Limestone: A natural analog in southwest Wyoming for geologic carbon–sulfur co-sequestration
,
2011
.
[9]
Zoe K. Shipton,et al.
He and Ne as tracers of natural CO2 migration up a fault from a deep reservoir
,
2011
.
[10]
Fedora Quattrocchi,et al.
Geochemical modeling of CO2 storage in deep reservoirs: The Weyburn Project (Canada) case study
,
2009
.
[11]
Jonny Rutqvist,et al.
Coupled non-isothermal, multiphase fluid flow, and geomechanical modeling of ground surface deformations and potential for induced micro-seismicity at the In Salah CO2 storage operation
,
2011
.
[12]
Barbara Sherwood Lollar,et al.
The noble gas geochemistry of natural CO2 gas reservoirs from the Colorado Plateau and Rocky Mountain provinces, USA
,
2008
.