Optimization of aerodynamic efficiency for twist morphing MAV wing

Abstract Twist morphing (TM) is a practical control technique in micro air vehicle (MAV) flight. However, TM wing has a lower aerodynamic efficiency ( C L / C D ) compared to membrane and rigid wing. This is due to massive drag penalty created on TM wing, which had overwhelmed the successive increase in its lift generation. Therefore, further C L /C D max optimization on TM wing is needed to obtain the optimal condition for the morphing wing configuration. In this paper, two-way fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulation and wind tunnel testing method are used to solve and study the basic wing aerodynamic performance over (non-optimal) TM, membrane and rigid wings. Then, a multifidelity data metamodel based design optimization (MBDO) process is adopted based on the Ansys-DesignXplorer frameworks. In the adaptive MBDO process, Kriging metamodel is used to construct the final multifidelity C L / C D responses by utilizing 23 multi-fidelity sample points from the FSI simulation and experimental data. The optimization results show that the optimal TM wing configuration is able to produce better C L / C D max magnitude by at least 2% than the non-optimal TM wings. The flow structure formation reveals that low TV strength on the optimal TM wing induces low C D generation which in turn improves its overall C L / C D max performance.

[1]  Kenji Takeda,et al.  Multifidelity surrogate modeling of experimental and computational aerodynamic data sets , 2011 .

[2]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Membrane Micro Air Vehicles with Adaptive Aerodynamic Twist: Numerical Modeling , 2007 .

[3]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: Experimental characterization, numerical modeling, and tailoring , 2008 .

[4]  Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan,et al.  The Aircraft Morphing Program , 1998 .

[5]  M. Gharib,et al.  Role of the tip vortex in the force generation of low-aspect-ratio normal flat plates , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Dong-Seop Han,et al.  Structural optimization for a jaw using iterative Kriging metamodels , 2008 .

[7]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  Flight Characteristics of Shaping the Membrane Wing of a Micro Air Vehicle , 2005 .

[8]  S. Xu,et al.  Influence of aspect ratio on tumbling plates , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Laminar-Turbulent Transition of a Low Reynolds Number Rigid or Flexible Airfoil , 2006 .

[10]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Effects of Sideslip on the Aerodynamics of Low-Aspect-Ratio Low-Reynolds-Number Wings , 2012 .

[11]  Shaker A. Meguid,et al.  Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges , 2010 .

[12]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  Flight Testing A Micro Air Vehicle Using Morphing For Aeroservoelastic Control , 2004 .

[13]  M. M. ElNomrossy,et al.  Optimal wing twist distribution for roll control of MAVs , 2011, Aeronautical Journal.

[14]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Morphing unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011 .

[15]  Dragos Viieru,et al.  Effect of Tip Vortex on Wing Aerodynamics of Micro Air Vehicles , 2004 .

[16]  Matthew Ringuette,et al.  Vortex formation and drag on low aspect ratio, normal flat plates , 2004 .

[17]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Mechanism for Warp-Controlled Twist of a Morphing Wing , 2010 .

[18]  V. Schulz,et al.  Comparing sampling strategies for aerodynamic Kriging surrogate models , 2012 .

[19]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  Investigation of Membrane Actuation for Roll Control of a Micro Air Vehicle , 2007 .

[20]  Tim Colonius,et al.  On the effect of tip vortices in low-Reynolds-number post-stall flow control ∗ , 2009 .

[21]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization of helicopter rotor blades including airfoil shape for hover performance , 2013 .

[22]  Bret Stanford,et al.  Aerodynamic Coefficients and Deformation Measurements on Flexible Micro Air Vehicle Wings , 2007 .

[23]  Bret Kennedy Stanford,et al.  Aeroelastic analysis and optimization of membrane micro air vehicle wings , 2008 .

[24]  Mohd Zulkifly Abdullah,et al.  Computational aerodynamic analysis on perimeter reinforced (PR)-compliant wing , 2013 .

[25]  Adam Klaptocz,et al.  Technology and Fabrication of Ultralight Micro-Aerial Vehicles , 2010, Flying Insects and Robots.