The presence of an audience and list type (competitional or noncompetitional) as joint determinants of performance in paired-associates learning.

[1]  Joseph Pessin,et al.  The Comparative Effects of Social and Mechanical Stimulation on Memorizing , 1933 .

[2]  L. Lee.  The effects of anxiety level and shock on a paired-associate verbal task. , 1961 .

[3]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses , 1966 .

[4]  C. Haagen,et al.  Synonymity, vividness, familiarity, and association value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives. , 1949, The Journal of psychology.

[5]  K W SPENCE,et al.  The relation of anxiety (drive) level to performance in competitional and non-competitional paired-associates learning. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Some Effects of Meprobamate on Human Learning , 1959 .

[7]  R. A. Champion,et al.  Task difficulty and drive in verbal learning. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  L. E. Travis,et al.  The effect of a small audience upon eye-hand coordination. , 1925 .

[9]  K W SPENCE,et al.  Anxiety (drive) level and degree of competition in paired-associates learning. , 1956, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[10]  J. W. Julian,et al.  Sex and birth-order differences in conformity as a function of need affiliation arousal. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Bruce O. Bergum,et al.  Effects of authoritarianism on vigilance performance. , 1963 .

[12]  M. Katahn.  Interaction of anxiety and ability in complex learning situations. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Taylor.  The effects of anxiety level and psychological stress on verbal learning. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.