Selecting an appropriate excavation construction method based on qualitative assessments

Choosing an appropriate excavation construction method is a key for successful completion of the project. However, such an evaluation involves a complex decision-making process associated with numerous uncertainty factors, imprecise information and judgments. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been widely applied to evaluate alternatives related to multiple decision criteria. Nevertheless, the AHP is incapable of dealing with the inherent subjectivity and ambiguity existing in the mapping of the decision-maker's judgment to exact numerical values. This paper presents a fuzzy AHP approach to cope with this problem and be an attempt in the determination of a suitable excavation construction method. The approach employs triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and the @a-cut concept to better represent the degrees of uncertainty held by the decision-maker. A case study concerning a foundation construction project is presented to illustrate the salient features of the model. The results demonstrate the applicability of the method that can be used for effectively evaluating excavation construction alternatives.

[1]  Ren-Jye Dzeng,et al.  Intelligent agents for supporting construction procurement negotiation , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Ren-Jye Dzeng,et al.  Learning heuristics for determining slurry wall panel lengths , 2006 .

[3]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  A self-organizing feature map-driven approach to fuzzy approximate reasoning , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Orlando Durán,et al.  Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Maurizio Bevilacqua,et al.  A combined goal programming - AHP approach to maintenance selection problem , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Saptarshi Sasmal,et al.  Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[8]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[9]  David G. Toll,et al.  A decision support system for geotechnical applications , 2001 .

[10]  Jun Wu,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[11]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method , 2001 .

[12]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[13]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  M. Arockiasamy,et al.  Selection of Earth Retention Systems Using Expert System , 1994 .

[15]  Ian E.G Davey-Wilson,et al.  Fuzzy set adaptation for foundation construction , 2001 .

[16]  Aviad Shapira,et al.  AHP-Based Equipment Selection Model for Construction Projects , 2005 .

[17]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[19]  Leu Sou-Sen,et al.  Neural-network-based regression model of ground surface settlement induced by deep excavation , 2004 .

[20]  Hitoshi Furuta,et al.  Applications of genetic algorithm to aesthetic design of dam structures , 1996 .

[21]  Franco K.T. Cheung,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of architectural consultants , 2002 .

[22]  Jyh-Bin Yang,et al.  A rule induction-based knowledge system for retaining wall selection , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..