Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems

We perform engineering cost analyses of systems capable of delivering 1‐5 million metric tonnes (Mt) of albedo modification material to altitudes of 18‐30 km. The goal is to compare a range of delivery systems evaluated on a consistent cost basis. Cost estimates are developed with statistical cost estimating relationships based on historical costs of aerospace development programs and operations concepts using labor rates appropriate to the operations. We evaluate existing aircraft cost of acquisition and operations, perform in-depth new aircraft and airship design studies and cost analyses, and survey rockets, guns, and suspended gas and slurry pipes, comparing their costs to those of aircraft and airships. Annual costs for delivery systems based on new aircraft designs are estimated to be $1‐3B to deliver 1 Mt to 20‐30 km or $2‐8B to deliver 5 Mt to the same altitude range. Costs for hybrid airships may be competitive, but their large surface area complicates operations in high altitude wind shear, and development costs are more uncertain than those for airplanes. Pipes suspended by floating platforms provide low recurring costs to pump a liquid or gas to altitudes as high as 20 km, but the research, development, testing and evaluation costs of these systems are high and carry a large uncertainty; the pipe system’s high operating pressures and tensile strength requirements bring the feasibility of this system into question. The costs for rockets and guns are significantly higher than those for other systems. We conclude that (a) the basic technological capability to deliver material to the stratosphere at million tonne per year rates exists today, (b) based on prior literature, a few million tonnes per year would be sufficient to alter radiative forcing by an amount roughly equivalent to the growth of anticipated greenhouse gas forcing over the next half century, and that (c) several different methods could possibly deliver this quantity for less than $8B per year. We do not address here the science of aerosols in the stratosphere, nor issues of risk, effectiveness or governance that will add to the costs of solar geoengineering.

[1]  M. Budyko The Earth's climate, past and future , 1982 .

[2]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[3]  J. Holton,et al.  Stratosphere‐troposphere exchange , 1995 .

[4]  David William Keith Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect 1 , 2000, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[5]  R. Angel Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1) , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  P. Crutzen Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[7]  Марк Д. Левайн,et al.  Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Technical Summary , 2007 .

[8]  J. Dutoit The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .

[9]  P. Rasch,et al.  An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Alan Robock,et al.  20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea , 2008 .

[11]  양민선 IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on climate Change) 외 , 2008 .

[12]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[13]  W. Nordhaus A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies , 2008 .

[14]  Ben Kravitz,et al.  Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering , 2009 .

[15]  J. I. Katz,et al.  Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies , 2009 .

[16]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Regional climate response to solar-radiation management , 2010 .

[17]  David W Keith,et al.  Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft , 2010 .

[19]  Jonathan I. Katz,et al.  Stratospheric albedo modification , 2010 .

[20]  J. Kok,et al.  The physics of wind-blown sand and dust , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[21]  David W. Keith,et al.  Climate policy under uncertainty: a case for solar geoengineering , 2013, Climatic Change.