Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7–50.6°; SD±3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0–33.3°; SD±6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6–50.2°; SD±6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6–46.9°; SD±10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and −5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.

[1]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[2]  F. Layher,et al.  The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Markus Tingart,et al.  Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery , 2009, Expert review of medical devices.

[4]  J. Olsen,et al.  Causes and Prevention , 1991, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[5]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Richard L Wixson,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  D. McCollum,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Aamer Malik,et al.  Combined Anteversion Technique for Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Rajiv Gandhi,et al.  Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[10]  Richard L Wixson,et al.  Computer-assisted total hip navigation. , 2008, Instructional course lectures.

[11]  Aamer Malik,et al.  Precision and Bias of Imageless Computer Navigation and Surgeon Estimates for Acetabular Component Position , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation , 2007, International Orthopaedics.

[13]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[14]  Brigitte M Jolles,et al.  Computer-assisted Cup Placement Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty Improve Accuracy of Placement , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement , 2007, The Lancet.

[16]  S Parratte,et al.  The use of ultrasound in acquisition of the anterior pelvic plane in computer-assisted total hip replacement: a cadaver study. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  M Tingart,et al.  Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  Yeon Soo Lee,et al.  Error in acetabular socket alignment due to the thick anterior pelvic soft tissues. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  U Langlotz,et al.  [Cup placement in hip replacement surgery -- A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty -- a multi-center study]. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[23]  L.-j. Yuan,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty , 1999, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[24]  M. Michel,et al.  MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. , 2007, Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja.

[25]  Michael Nogler,et al.  Reduced Variability of Acetabular Cup Positioning with Use of an Imageless Navigation System , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.