Decades of improvements in re-entry ballistic vehicle tracking

This paper deals with a missile defense challenge, which has been studied extensively for decades and still remains a topic of active research, the tracking of a ballistic vehicle in its re-entry phase. With Anti-Ballistic Missile or Anti-Tactical-Ballistic Missile goals, most of missile defenses need to track re-entry vehicles with a view to locating them precisely and allowing low altitude interception. The re-entry vehicle leaves a quiet exoatmospheric phase and a quasi-Keplerian motion to an endo-atmospheric phase with large aerodynamic loads and a sudden deceleration. The motion is then obviously nonlinear and furthermore both the extent and the evolution of the drag are difficult to predict. Since the sixties, while more and more efficient sensors, such as sophisticated phased-array radars, were developed, the associated data processing techniques have been improved, taking advantage of computer performance increases. Although re-entry vehicle tracking is undoubtedly a non-linear filtering problem, it was firstly solved by rustic linear filters with fixed weight and an assumed drag table. Then, Kalman filters were exploited. Uncoupled and polynomial for a while, they are now fully coupled and really non-linear. They are called Extended Kalman filters, are based on the linearization about the estimated state and are the current efficient and classic solution to non-linear filtering. Moreover, they perform drag estimation which may be useful to the identification capabilities of the missile defense. In the future, even more sophisticated techniques, such as the promising and fashionable particle filtering, are likely to be developed in re-entry vehicle tracking.

[1]  A. Farina,et al.  Tracking a ballistic target: comparison of several nonlinear filters , 2002 .

[2]  Subhash Challa,et al.  Nonlinear filter design using Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov probability density evolutions , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[3]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Comparison of Four Filtering Options for a Radar Tracking Problem , 1998 .

[4]  A. V. Mrstik,et al.  A track filter for reentry objects with uncertain drag , 1999 .

[5]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[7]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[8]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Comparison of Filtering Options for Ballistic Coefficient Estimation , 1998 .

[9]  R. Mehra A comparison of several nonlinear filters for reentry vehicle tracking , 1971 .

[10]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  Editors: Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001 .

[11]  R. Fitzgerald,et al.  Decoupled Kalman filters for phased array radar tracking , 1983 .

[12]  R. L. Cooperman,et al.  Tactical ballistic missile tracking using the interacting multiple model algorithm , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[13]  F. Regan,et al.  Dynamics of atmospheric re-entry , 1993 .

[14]  P. Minvielle Tracking a ballistic re-entry vehicle with a sequential Monte-Carlo filter , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  N. Gordon,et al.  Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation , 1993 .

[16]  P. J. Costa,et al.  Extended Kalman-Bucy filters for radar tracking and identification , 1991, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE National Radar Conference.