The Tsunami of 26 December, 2004: Numerical Modeling and Energy Considerations

A numerical model for the global tsunamis computation constructed by Kowaliket al. (2005), is applied to the tsunami of 26 December, 2004 in the World Ocean from 80°S to 69°N with spatial resolution of one minute. Because the computational domain includes close to 200 million grid points, a parallel version of the code was developed and run on a Cray X1 supercomputer. An energy flux function is used to investigate energy transfer from the tsunami source to the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Although the first energy input into the Pacific Ocean was the primary (direct) wave, reflections from the Sri Lankan and eastern shores of Maldives were a larger source. The tsunami traveled from Indonesia, around New Zealand, and into the Pacific Ocean by various routes. The direct path through the deep ocean to North America carried miniscule energy, while the stronger signal traveled a considerably longer distance via South Pacific ridges as these bathymetric features amplified the energy flux vectors. Travel times for these amplified energy fluxes are much longer than the arrival of the first wave. These large fluxes are organized in the wave-like form when propagating between Australia and Antarctica. The sources for the larger fluxes are multiple reflections from the Seychelles, Maldives and a slower direct signal from the Bay of Bengal. The energy flux into the Atlantic Ocean shows a different pattern since the energy is pumped into this domain through the directional properties of the source function. The energy flow into the Pacific Ocean is approximately 75% of the total flow to the Atlantic Ocean. In many locations along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts, the first arriving signal, or forerunner, has lower amplitude than the main signal which often is much delayed. Understanding this temporal distribution is important for an application to tsunami warning and prediction.

[1]  NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE GLOBAL TSUNAMI , 2005 .

[2]  Stephan T. Grilli,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the December 26, 2004: Indian Ocean Tsunami , 2008, HPSC.

[3]  Robert O. Reid,et al.  Numerical Model for Storm Surges in Galveston Bay , 1968 .

[4]  Z. Kowalik,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Ocean Dynamics , 1993 .

[5]  Yutaka Hayashi,et al.  The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: Tsunami source model from satellite altimetry , 2006 .

[6]  Thorkild Aarup,et al.  Tide gauge observations of the Indian Ocean tsunami, December 26, 2004 , 2005 .

[7]  Zygmunt Kowalik,et al.  Numerical simulation of two‐dimensional tsunami runup , 1993 .

[8]  Emile A. Okal,et al.  Seismology: Speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[10]  Zygmunt Kowalik BASIC RELATIONS BETWEEN TSUNAMIS CALCULATION AND THEIR PHYSICS-II , 2003 .

[11]  C. Mei The applied dynamics of ocean surface waves , 1983 .

[12]  W. Munk,et al.  Long-period Waves Over California''s Continental Borderland, Part I., Background Spectra , 1962 .

[13]  Jim Gower Jason 1 detects the 26 December 2004 tsunami , 2005 .

[14]  R. Flather,et al.  Tidal Computations for Morecambe Bay , 2007 .

[15]  Zygmunt Kowalik,et al.  NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE GLOBAL TSUNAMI : Indonesian Tsunami of 26 December 2004 , 2006 .

[16]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004 , 2005, Science.

[17]  Vasily Titov,et al.  The Global Reach of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra Tsunami , 2005, Science.

[18]  J. Tromp,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005 .

[19]  C. Mader Numerical modeling of water waves , 1979 .