Performance evaluation of grid-connected photovoltaic systems based on two photovoltaic module technologies under tropical climate conditions

Abstract The aim of this paper is to evaluate grid-connected photovoltaic systems based on two kinds of photovoltaic module technologies. This study presents a one-year evaluation of four grid-connected photovoltaic systems installed at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, in Tsukuba in the northern Kantō region of Japan. Two grid-connected systems based on multi-crystalline: mc-Si and two other ones based on thin film technology namely copper indium selenium: CIS modules. The monitoring data have been collected for one year to make an evaluation of all possible changes in climate environment. The goal of this study is to define the characteristics, the behavior and the sensitivity of the grid-connected PV system to the environmental parameters. Various parameters were used for the outdoor performance evaluation of the four grid-connected PV systems; including performance ratio, temperature losses, final yield, reference yield, AC energy generated and system efficiency. It was found that the grid-connected PV systems based on mc-Si technology perform much better than the systems based on CIS. The annual average daily performance ratios of the systems based on mc-Si modules were found to be about 5.53% higher compared to those of the systems based on CIS module, and an annual average daily AC energy production about 42.85% higher than CIS.

[1]  Stefano Alessandrini,et al.  Analysis of the outdoor performance and efficiency of two grid connected photovoltaic systems in northern Italy , 2014 .

[2]  Hussein A. Kazem,et al.  Comparison of prediction methods of photovoltaic power system production using a measured dataset , 2017 .

[3]  J. Carretero,et al.  Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions , 2014 .

[4]  Indradip Mitra,et al.  Performance ratio – Crucial parameter for grid connected PV plants , 2016 .

[5]  Shahriar Shafiee,et al.  When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished , 2009 .

[6]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 40) , 2012 .

[7]  Ayman Al-Qattan,et al.  Performance evaluation of photovoltaic systems on Kuwaiti schools’ rooftop , 2015 .

[8]  A. Massi Pavan,et al.  Monitoring, diagnosis, and power forecasting for photovoltaic fields: A review , 2017 .

[9]  David A. Quansah,et al.  Performance analysis of different grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) system technologies with combined capacity of 20 kW located in humid tropical climate , 2017 .

[10]  Yumiko Iwafune,et al.  A comparison of the effects of energy management using heat pump water heaters and batteries in photovoltaic -installed houses , 2017 .

[11]  Jeyraj Selvaraj,et al.  Energy policy to promote photovoltaic generation , 2013 .

[12]  A. Demirbas Future Energy Sources , 2016 .

[13]  Rashid Alammari,et al.  Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices , 2015 .

[14]  Atse Louwen,et al.  PV system monitoring and characterization : Chapter 11.4 , 2017 .

[15]  N. Panwar,et al.  Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review , 2011 .

[16]  Ali M. Humada,et al.  Performance evaluation of two PV technologies (c-Si and CIS) for building integrated photovoltaic based on tropical climate condition: A case study in Malaysia , 2016 .

[17]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Performance analysis and comparison of two silicon material based photovoltaic technologies under actual climatic conditions in Western India , 2014 .

[18]  Marko Topič,et al.  Apparent performance ratio of photovoltaic systems—A methodology for evaluation of photovoltaic systems across a region , 2016 .

[19]  Linda Steg,et al.  Psychological research and global climate change , 2015 .