Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors' demands and support in online and traditional classrooms

Abstract In this study, seven graduate students were interviewed and 187 (91 online; 96 traditional) graduate students were surveyed about perceptions of differences in instructors' demands and support and student' motivation, self-regulation, satisfaction, and perceptions of learning in these environments. Results indicated significant differences in students' perceptions on all variables except self-efficacy. Results indicated a strong effect for differences between perceived instructor affective support in online and traditional classrooms. Although students in traditional classrooms ranked instructors' affective support higher, the variable had a stronger relationship with online students' satisfaction. Differences between online and traditional students' reports of instructors' academic support, instructors' demands, and students' satisfaction were significant with medium effect sizes. Results are important because they provide information about students' perceptions of the differences in environments created by instructors that relate to students' affective outcomes.

[1]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[2]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[3]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[4]  J. Mintzes.  Overt Teaching Behaviors and Student Ratings of Instructors , 1979 .

[5]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[6]  Kathleen Ellis.  The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning , 2004 .

[7]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education , 2002 .

[8]  Amy Strage,et al.  Instructional Support and Demands: Helping Teachers Help Students Meet Increasing Academic Standards , 1996 .

[9]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Beyond Motivation: Middle School Students' Perceptions of Press for Understanding in Math , 2002 .

[10]  C. Wolters.  Self-Regulated Learning and College Students' Regulation of Motivation. , 1998 .

[11]  B. McCombs,et al.  Putting the Self in Self-Regulated Learning: The Self as Agent in Integrating Will and Skill , 1990 .

[12]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for Beginners , 2000 .

[13]  Shirley L. Yu,et al.  The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning , 1996 .

[14]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  A. Ryan,et al.  The Classroom Social Environment and Changes in Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement During Middle School , 2001 .

[16]  Graham J Hole,et al.  How to Design and Report Experiments , 2002 .

[17]  J. Ormrod.  Educational Psychology : Developing Learners , 1997 .

[18]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. , 2002 .

[19]  Frederick B. King,et al.  Self-Regulatory Behavior Influences in Distance Learning , 2000 .

[20]  The Challenge to Challenge: Shifting the Motivational Climate of the College Classroom for Enhanced Learning , 2003 .

[21]  Tung Bui,et al.  Impact of Learning Strategies and Motivation on Performance: A Study in Web-Based Instruction. , 2001 .

[22]  Lorna J. Gifford.  Graduate Students' Perceptions of Time Spent in Taking a Course by Internet versus Taking a Course in a Regular Classroom , 1998 .

[23]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Who Prefers What? Disciplinary Differences in Students' Preferred Approaches to Teaching and Learning Styles , 2000 .