[Recommendations for the assessment of birth size and postnatal growth of preterm newborns].

It is unquestionable the need to have standards of size at birth and growth to evaluate and contribute to guide the actions in the care of the newborn. For many years the references of Lejarraga and Fustiñana were used, progressively replaced by those of Fenton and Kim. However, recently, the INTERGROWTH-21st project has developed prescriptive growth standards to evaluate the size at birth from 33 weeks of gestational age, references from 24 to 32.6 weeks of gestational age, and curves for postnatal growth from 27 weeks of gestational age onward. The Growth and Development and Neonatal Fetal Studies Committees of the Argentine Society of Pediatrics in conjunction with the Secretary of National Government of Health agreed to recommend the replacement of the Fenton and Kim curves with those of INTERGROWTH-21st.

[1]  V. Cardoso,et al.  Comparison of birth weight, length, and head circumference between the BRISA-RP and Intergrowth-21st cohorts , 2019, Jornal de pediatria.

[2]  J. Hirst,et al.  Monitoring the Postnatal Growth of Preterm Infants: A Paradigm Change , 2018, Pediatrics.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  The satisfactory growth and development at 2 years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J. Dipierri,et al.  Prevalencias de bajo peso y pequeño para la edad gestacional en Argentina: comparación entre el estándar INTERGROWTH-21st y una referencia argentina , 2017 .

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  Body composition at birth and its relationship with neonatal anthropometric ratios: the newborn body composition study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project , 2017, Pediatric Research.

[6]  Shiliang Liu,et al.  Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project newborn standard for use in Canada , 2017, PloS one.

[7]  C. Mckinlay,et al.  INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  T. Fenton,et al.  INTERGROWTH-21st very preterm size at birth reference charts , 2016, The Lancet.

[9]  Z. Bhutta,et al.  Monitoring postnatal growth of preterm infants: present and future. , 2016, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  Systematic review of the methodological quality of studies designed to create neonatal anthropometric charts , 2015, Acta paediatrica.

[11]  José Villar,et al.  International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project , 2014, The Lancet.

[12]  T. Fenton,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants , 2013, BMC Pediatrics.

[13]  T. Fenton,et al.  A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format , 2003, BMC pediatrics.

[14]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.