The effect of core framework designs on the fracture loads of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures on posterior implants.

This study evaluated the fracture loads of three-unit all-ceramic bridges on implants; the core frameworks of the bridges were made of zirconium oxide. Three core framework designs were fabricated according to the design of the bars between the retainers: (i) straight, (ii) curved in the occlusal direction, or (iii) curved in the gingival direction. A static load was applied at the centre of the pontic, and the mean initial crack and final fracture loads were measured and compared. The core framework curved in the occlusal direction had the highest final fracture loads; there were significant differences (P < 0.05) in the mean final fracture load, whereas initial fracture load, which fractured of veneered porcelain, did not show significant differences among three designs. The all-ceramic bridges on the implants made with Procera zirconium core frameworks had high final fracture load. The core framework design that curved in the occlusal direction helped the framework withstand the occlusal load, which results in reliable prostheses, especially in the molar region.

[1]  Ariel J Raigrodski,et al.  Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  N. Götzen,et al.  Influence of Connector Design on Fracture Probability of Ceramic Fixed-partial Dentures , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[3]  Won-Suck Oh,et al.  Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  P. Vult von Steyern,et al.  Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  J. Tinschert,et al.  Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[6]  S. Bayne,et al.  Stress concentration in all-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[7]  J A Tesk,et al.  Failure of All-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures in vitro and in vivo: Analysis and Modeling , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[8]  L. Pröbster Survival rate of In-Ceram restorations. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[9]  S. Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all-ceramic fixed partial denture. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  P. Vult von Steyern,et al.  Use of abutment-teeth vs. dental implants to support all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in-vitro study on fracture strength. , 2005, Swedish dental journal.

[11]  María Jesús Suárez,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  G E Carlsson,et al.  Bite force and state of dentition. , 1977, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.