On the value of relative flow data

Abstract Traffic flow can be described using three dimensions, i.e., space x, time t and cumulative flow N. This study considers estimating the cumulative flow over space and time, i.e., N ( x , t ) , using relative flow data collected by stationary and moving observers. Stationary observers, e.g., loop-detectors, can observe flow at fixed position over time. Furthermore, automated or other equipped and connected vehicles can serve as moving observers that observe flow relative to their position over time. To present the value of relative flow data, in this paper, we take the perspective of a model-based estimation approach. In this approach, the data is used in two processes: (1) information assimilation of real-time data and models and (2) learning of the models used in information assimilation based on historical data. This paper focuses on traffic state estimation on links. However, we explain that, in absence of stationary observer that are positioned at the link boundaries, it is valuable to consider the information propagation over nodes. Throughout this study a LWR-model with a triangular fundamental diagram (FD) is used to develop the principles that can be used for the two processes. These principles are tested in a simulation (VISSIM) study. This study shows that we can find the traffic flow model parameters and can partially estimate the link boundary conditions based on relative flow data collected by moving observers alone. It also shows that the traffic flow behavior differs partially from the LWR-model with triangular FD, and therefore, we recommend the option to learn and use other traffic flow models in future research. Overall, relative flow data is considered valuable to obtain model learning datasets and to estimate the traffic state.

[1]  Isaak Yperman,et al.  The Link Transmission Model for dynamic network loading , 2007 .

[2]  G. F. Newell A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory , 1993 .

[3]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Reconstructing the spatio-temporal traffic dynamics from stationary detector data , 2002 .

[4]  Sebastiaan Thoen,et al.  Estimating the fundamental diagram using moving observers , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[5]  Henk J. van Zuylen,et al.  Localized Extended Kalman Filter for Scalable Real-Time Traffic State Estimation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Stephan Olariu,et al.  On a Variant of the Mobile Observer Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Macroscopic traffic state estimation using relative flows from stationary and moving observers , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[8]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  A Generic Methodology to Estimate Vehicle Accumulation on Urban Arterials by Fusing Vehicle Counts and Travel Times , 2015 .

[9]  Rabi G. Mishalani,et al.  Using transit or municipal vehicles as moving observer platforms for large scale collection of traffic and transportation system information , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[10]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Lax–Hopf Based Incorporation of Internal Boundary Conditions Into Hamilton-Jacobi Equation. Part II: Computational Methods , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  C. Daganzo A variational formulation of kinematic waves: basic theory and complex boundary conditions , 2005 .

[12]  P. I. Richards Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[13]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A SIMPLIFIED THEORY OF KINEMATIC WAVES , 1991 .

[14]  Jaimyoung Kwon,et al.  Automatic Calibration of the Fundamental Diagram and Empirical Observations on Capacity , 2009 .

[15]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Traffic state estimation on highway: A comprehensive survey , 2017, Annu. Rev. Control..

[16]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Automatic fitting procedure for the fundamental diagram , 2014 .

[17]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Fusing Loop Detector and Probe Vehicle Data to Estimate Travel Time Statistics on Signalized Urban Networks , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[18]  Zhe Sun,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of states and parameters in Newell’s simplified kinematic wave model with Eulerian and Lagrangian traffic data , 2017 .

[19]  G. F. Newell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Representation of Traffic Flow , 1971 .

[20]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  Stochastic Extension of Newell's Three-Detector Method , 2012 .

[21]  Peter Vortisch,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC FLOW MODEL VISSIM IN DIFFERENT REAL-WORLD SITUATIONS , 2001 .

[22]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Queue-length estimation using real-time traffic data , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[23]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Real-time freeway traffic state estimation based on extended Kalman filter: a general approach , 2005 .

[24]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Lax–Hopf Based Incorporation of Internal Boundary Conditions Into Hamilton–Jacobi Equation. Part I: Theory , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  M J Lighthill,et al.  ON KINEMATIC WAVES.. , 1955 .

[27]  G. F. Newell A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks , 1993 .

[28]  A. Bayen,et al.  Guaranteed bounds for traffic flow parameters estimation using mixed Lagrangian-Eulerian sensing , 2008, 2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.