Are Greebles like faces? Using the neuropsychological exception to test the rule

[1]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Face-selective Activation in a Congenital Prosopagnosic Subject , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Kimchi,et al.  What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Tom A Schweizer,et al.  The role of premorbid expertise on object identification in a patient with category-specific visual agnosia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[5]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  S. Bentin,et al.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[8]  M. Behrmann,et al.  The effects of rotation and inversion on face processing in prosopagnosia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Face processing occurs outside the fusiform 'face area' in autism: evidence from functional MRI. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  C. Genovese,et al.  A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The real-object advantage in agnosia: Evidence for a role of surface and depth information in object recognition , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  P. Mcmullen,et al.  Apperceptive agnosia and face recognition , 2000 .

[13]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Abnormal ventral temporal cortical activity during face discrimination among individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. , 2000, Archives of general psychiatry.

[15]  M Moscovitch,et al.  SUPER FACE-INVERSION EFFECTS FOR ISOLATED INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL FEATURES, AND FOR FRACTURED FACES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Farah,et al.  EARLY COMMITMENT OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR FACE RECOGNITION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  N Kanwisher,et al.  THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF FACE PROCESSING: AN INTRODUCTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  DOES VISUAL SUBORDINATE-LEVEL CATEGORISATION ENGAGE THE FUNCTIONALLY DEFINED FUSIFORM FACE AREA? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[21]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Modularity and cognition , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[26]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[27]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing , 1998 .

[28]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual Object Agnosia without Alexia or Prosopagnosia: Arguments for Separate Knowledge Stores , 1997 .

[32]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Constraining claims about theories of semantic memory: More on unitary versus multiple semantics , 1995 .

[35]  G K Humphrey,et al.  The Role of Surface Information in Object Recognition: Studies of a Visual Form Agnosic and Normal Subjects , 1994, Perception.

[36]  M Behrmann,et al.  Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing objects and faces , 1994 .

[38]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient , 1992, Nature.

[40]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Preserved Visual Imagery and Categorization in a Case of Associative Visual Agnosia , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Farah.  Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[42]  E. Warrington,et al.  Visual associative agnosia: a clinico-anatomical study of a single case. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[43]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[44]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The real object advantage in agnosia: Evidence of a role for shading and depth in object recognition , 2000 .

[45]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society , 1997 .

[46]  Betsy Bates,et al.  Modularity, Domain Specificity, and the Development of Language , 1994 .

[47]  Dennis C. Hay,et al.  Configural information in face recognition , 1987 .

[48]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .