Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions using sheathless guiding catheters: a multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND Transradial approach (TRA) for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is a common alternative to transfemoral approach associated with lower complications. However, a limitation of TRA is the use of large caliber guiding catheters due to the small size of the radial artery. The sheathless guiding catheter system that is in diameter 1-2 French (Fr) smaller than the corresponding introducer sheath may overcome these difficulties. METHODS From January 2010 through December 2010 in 5 Italian high-volume hospitals, 213 consecutive patients who underwent TRA-PCIs using the sheathless Eaucath guiding catheter system because of small radial artery caliber (Group 1) or undergoing bifurcation PCIs (Group 2) were enrolled in this registry. In patients of Group 1 (n = 79), a 6.5-Fr sheathless guiding catheter was employed, whereas in patients of Group 2 (n = 134) a 7.5 Fr was used. RESULTS Among the 213 patients enrolled, 270 vessels were treated for 316 lesions. No procedures required conversion to a conventional guiding catheter system. There were significantly more female patients in Group 1, and they were, older, shorter, and thinner than patients in Group 2. No cases of major vascular complications were observed in either groups. During procedures, adjunctive devices employed included intravascular ultrasound, thrombectomy catheters, and distal protection systems. CONCLUSIONS The use of the sheathless guiding catheter system is feasible for TRA-PCIs in case of small radial artery caliber or intended coronary bifurcation intervention.

[1]  Í. Lozano,et al.  Aterectomía de rotación por vía radial con catéter guía 7,5 Fr sin introductor , 2011 .

[2]  P. Avanzas,et al.  Rotational atherectomy through radial access with a 7.5 fr sheathless guiding catheter. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[3]  M. Liang,et al.  Transradial simultaneous kissing stenting (SKS) with SheathLess access , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  M. Mamas,et al.  Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A feasibility study , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  I. Sperduti,et al.  Transradial access compared with femoral puncture closure devices in percutaneous coronary procedures. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2009, American heart journal.

[7]  M. Mamas,et al.  Atraumatic complex transradial intervention using large bore sheathless guide catheter , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  G. Laarman,et al.  Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[9]  B. Yoo,et al.  Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[10]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G. Laarman,et al.  Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: A randomized double‐blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  Hiroshi Ogawa,et al.  Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  H. Völzke,et al.  A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  R. Sabatier,et al.  Mini‐invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: Direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and transradial approach , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  D. Cohen,et al.  Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. , 1999, American heart journal.

[16]  S. Saito,et al.  Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[17]  J. Kleinert,et al.  Color flow Doppler: imaging the upper extremity. , 1993, The Journal of hand surgery.