The reported experiment took place in a professional forecasting organization accustomed to giving verbal probability assessments (‘likely’, ‘probable’, etc.). It attempts to highlight the communication problems caused by verbal probability expressions and to offer possible solutions that are compatible with the forecasters overall perspective on their jobs
Experts in the organization were first asked to give a numerical translation to 30 different verbal probability expressions most of which were taken from the organization's own published political forecasts. In a second part of the experiment the experts were given 15 paragraphs selected from the organization's political publications each of which contained at least one verbal expression of probability. Subjects were again asked to give a numerical translation to each verbal probability expression
The results indicate that (a) there is a high variability in the interpretation of verbal probability expressions and (b) the variability is even higher in context. Possible reasons for the context effect are discussed and practical implications are suggested.
[1]
Sarah Lichtenstein,et al.
Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities
,
1967
.
[2]
J L KOBRICK,et al.
Word usage and synonym representation in the English language.
,
1952,
Journal of abnormal psychology.
[3]
R. H. Simpson,et al.
The specific meanings of certain terms indicating differing degrees of frequency.
,
1944
.
[4]
P. Slovic,et al.
Value as a Determiner of Subjective Probability
,
1966
.
[5]
Richards J. Heuer,et al.
Quantitative Approaches to Political Intelligence
,
1978
.
[6]
A. H. Murphy,et al.
“Good” Probability Assessors
,
1968
.
[7]
R. H. Simpson,et al.
Stability in meanings for quantitative terms: A comparison over 20 years
,
1963
.
[8]
A. H. Murphy,et al.
Probability Forecasts: A Survey of National Weather Service Forecasters
,
1974
.