School tracking, social segregation and educational opportunity: evidence from Belgium

Educational tracking is a very controversial issue in education. The tracking debate is about the virtues of uniformity and vertical differentiation in the curriculum and teaching. The pro-tracking group claims that curriculum and teaching better aimed at children's varied interest and skills will foster learning efficacy. The anti-tracking group claims that tracking systems are inefficient and unfair because they hinder learning and distribute learning inequitably. In this paper we provide a detailed within-country analysis of a specific educational system with a long history of early educational tracking between schools, namely the Flemish secondary school system in Belgium. This is interesting place to look because it provides a remarkable mix of excellence and inequality. Indeed the Flemish school system is repeatedly one of the best performer in the international harmonized PISA tests in math, science and reading; whereas it produces some of the most unequal distributions of learning between schools and students. Combining evidence from the PISA 2006 data set at the student and school level with recent statistical methods, we show first the dramatic impact of tracking on social segregation; and then, the impact of social segregation on equality of educational opportunity (adequately measured). It is shown that tracking, via social segregation, has a major effect on inequality of opportunity. Children of different economic classes will have different access to knowledge.

[1]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SEGREGATION INDEXES , 1955 .

[2]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  A. Shorrocks Ranking Income Distributions , 1983 .

[4]  Grethe Peterson,et al.  The Tanner Lectures on Human Values , 1988 .

[5]  Richard J. Arneson Equality and equal opportunity for welfare , 1989 .

[6]  Charles A.M. de Bartolome,et al.  Equilibrium and Inefficiency in a Community Model With Peer Group Effects , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[8]  Anne Wheelock,et al.  Crossing the Tracks: How 'Untracking' Can Save America's Schools , 1992 .

[9]  John E. Roemer,et al.  A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner , 1992 .

[10]  John H. Bishop,et al.  The impact of academic competencies on wages, unemployment, and job performance , 1992 .

[11]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[12]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  An efficient cross-validation algorithm for window width selection for nonparametric kernel regression , 1993 .

[13]  Marc Fleurbaey,et al.  Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome? , 1995, Economics and Philosophy.

[14]  Roland Bénabou,et al.  Heterogeneity, Stratification, and Growth: Macroeconomic Implications of Community Structure and School Finance , 1996 .

[15]  Laura M. Argys,et al.  Tracking in the United States: Descriptive statistics from NELS , 1996 .

[16]  D. Epple,et al.  American Economic Association Competition between Private and Public Schools , Vouchers , and Peer-Group Effects , 2007 .

[17]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models , 1998 .

[18]  Tom Loveless,et al.  The Tracking Wars: State Reform Meets School Policy , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers , 2000 .

[20]  Ability Tracking, School Competition, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits , 2000 .

[21]  Marian Perkins,et al.  The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Anthony F. Heath,et al.  Equality of Opportunity , 2017 .

[23]  Robert J. Barro,et al.  Human Capital and Growth , 2001 .

[24]  David N. Figlio,et al.  School Choice and the Distributional Effects of Ability Tracking: Does Separation Increase Equality? , 2000 .

[25]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Efficiency and Equity in Schools Around the World , 2002 .

[26]  E. Plug,et al.  Schooling, Family Background, and Adoption: Is It Nature or Is It Nurture? , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  S. Nickell Poverty and Worklessness in Britain , 2004 .

[28]  J. Reynolds Crossing the tracks , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  Robert M. Hutchens,et al.  One Measure of Segregation , 2004 .

[30]  D. Checchi,et al.  Regional Disparities and Inequality of Opportunity: The Case of Italy , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Ludger Woessmann,et al.  Education Policy and Equality of Opportunity , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  V. Vandenberghe,et al.  What Does It Take to Achieve Equality of Opportunity in Education ? An Empirical Investigation Based on Brazilian Data , 2005 .

[33]  Andreas Ammermüller Educational Opportunities and the Role of Institutions , 2005 .

[34]  J. Roemer,et al.  Equalizing Opportunity for Racial and Socioeconomic Groups in the United States Through Educational Finance Reform , 2005 .

[35]  Christian Monseur PISA 2003 Data Analysis Manual : spss users , 2005 .

[36]  Daniele Checchi,et al.  Does School Tracking Affect Equality of Opportunity? New International Evidence , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[37]  Sylke V. Schnepf,et al.  Social segregation in secondary schools: how does England compare with other countries? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Handbook of the Economics of Education , 2006 .

[39]  Qi Li,et al.  Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[40]  F. Bourguignon,et al.  Inequality of Opportunity in Brazil , 2007 .

[41]  Does Ability Tracking Exacerbate the Role of Family Background for Student's Test Scores? , 2007 .

[42]  Vito Peragine,et al.  Higher Education and Equality of Opportunity in Italy , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[43]  Nicolas Pistolesi Inequality of opportunity in the land of opportunities, 1968–2001 , 2009 .

[44]  D. Checchi,et al.  Intergenerational Mobility and Schooling Decisions in Germany and Italy: The Impact of Secondary School Tracks , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[45]  Pierre Foy,et al.  PIRLS 2006 International Report IEA's Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in Primary Schools in 40 Countries , 2007 .

[46]  R. Koenker,et al.  Regression Quantiles , 2007 .

[47]  Andreas Schleicher,et al.  PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World , 2007 .

[48]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Conditional CDF and Quantile Functions With Mixed Categorical and Continuous Data , 2008 .

[49]  Anna Rådström,et al.  What is Equality , 2008 .

[50]  Esther Duflo,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES PEER EFFECTS AND THE IMPACT OF TRACKING: EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EVALUATION IN KENYA , 2008 .

[51]  A. Trannoy,et al.  Inequality of opportunities vs inequality of outcomes: Are Western Societies all alike? , 2005 .

[52]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The role of cognitive skills in economic development , 2008 .

[53]  Dalit Contini,et al.  Primary and Secondary Effects in Educational Attainment in Italy , 2008 .

[54]  Xavier Ramos Empirical Evidence on Inequality of Opportunity , 2009 .

[55]  Tuomas Pekkarinen,et al.  School tracking and intergenerational income mobility: Evidence from the Finnish comprehensive school reform , 2009 .

[56]  Victor Lavy,et al.  The good , the bad and the average : evidence on the scale and nature of ability peer effects in schools Working paper , 2011 .

[57]  Alain Trannoy,et al.  Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France , 2009 .

[58]  The Good, the Bad and the Average: Evidence on the Scale and Nature of Ability Peer Effects in Schools. NBER Working Paper No. 15600. , 2009 .

[59]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Fertility, Human Capital Accumulation, and the Pension System , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[60]  A. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[61]  Helena Holmlund,et al.  The Causal Effect of Parents' Schooling on Children's Schooling - A Comparison of Estimation Methods , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[62]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  Adaptation and Mitigation in Long-term Climate Policy , 2010, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[63]  J. Gabszewicz,et al.  Product innovation and market acquisition of firms , 2010 .

[64]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  Property rights with biological spillovers: when Hardin meets Meade , 2010 .

[65]  Rüdiger Stephan,et al.  An extension of disjunctive programming and its impact for compact tree formulations , 2010, 1007.1136.

[66]  T. Baudin The optimal trade-off between quality and quantity with uncertain child survival , 2010 .

[67]  Jean-Pierre Florens,et al.  Nonparametric frontier estimation from noisy data , 2010 .

[68]  Sandra McNally,et al.  The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools , 2010, The Journal of Human Resources.

[69]  Miquel Àngel Alegre,et al.  School regimes and education equity: Some insights based on PISA 2006 , 2010 .

[70]  D. Checchi,et al.  Inequality of opportunity in Italy , 2010 .

[71]  F. Schroyen,et al.  Optimal pricing and capacity choice for a public service under risk of interruption , 2011 .

[72]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Mixing Sets Linked by Bidirected Paths , 2011, SIAM J. Optim..

[73]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  The Benefits of Cooperation Under Uncertainty: the Case of Climate Change , 2011, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[74]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Low-Rank Matrix Approximation with Weights or Missing Data Is NP-Hard , 2010, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[75]  J. Betts The Economics of Tracking in Education , 2011 .

[76]  Joyce L. Jenkins,et al.  On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice , 2012 .

[77]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  A multilevel approach for nonnegative matrix factorization , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[78]  Axel Gautier,et al.  Competitively neutral universal service obligations , 2012, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[79]  The Causal Effect of Parent's Schooling on Children's Schooling: A Comparison of Estimation Methods , .