Process sensitivities in exemplary chemo-epitaxy directed self-assembly integration

Directed Self Assembly (DSA) using block copolymers (BCP) has received considerable attention over the past few years as a potential complementary lithographic technique. While many are focused on adapting DSA integrations to high volume manufacturing, the key to the technology’s success lies in its ability to generate low defect patterns. The best way to drive the technology toward a zero defect solution is to understand the fundamentals of the block copolymer assembly, the interactions of the block copolymer with the underlying chemical pattern, and the evaluation of process parameters to obtain a high degree of order of the BCP morphologies. To this end, recent research has investigated numerous material, structural, and process sensitivities of an exemplary chemo-epitaxy line/space integration. Using the DSA flow implemented at imec, substrate properties, such as the geometry and chemistry, were studied and provided the first results regarding the dimensions of the nano-patterns and the energetic conditions necessary to obtain good alignment of the BCP. Additional parameters that have been explored include BCP film thickness and the bake conditions used to execute various steps of the flow. With this work, the key parameters that drive the assembly process have been identified. This will allow the definition of an optimized process window and materials for defect minimization.

[1]  Dieter Van Den Heuvel,et al.  Defect source analysis of directed self-assembly process (DSA of DSA) , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Hengpeng Wu,et al.  All track directed self-assembly of block copolymers: process flow and origin of defects , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Eungnak Han,et al.  Integration of block copolymer directed assembly with 193 immersion lithography , 2010 .

[4]  E. Han,et al.  Effect of Composition of Substrate-Modifying Random Copolymers on the Orientation of Symmetric and Asymmetric Diblock Copolymer Domains , 2008 .

[5]  Joy Y. Cheng,et al.  Simple and versatile methods to integrate directed self-assembly with optical lithography using a polarity-switched photoresist. , 2010, ACS nano.

[6]  Hengpeng Wu,et al.  Geometric Control of Chemically Nano-patterned Substrates for Feature Multiplication Using Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers , 2012 .

[7]  Eungnak Han,et al.  Fabrication of Lithographically Defined Chemically Patterned Polymer Brushes and Mats , 2011 .

[8]  William D. Hinsberg,et al.  Integration of Directed Self-Assembly with 193 nm Lithography , 2010 .

[9]  Juan J. de Pablo,et al.  Interpolation in the Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers on Nanopatterned Substrates: Simulation and Experiments , 2010 .

[10]  Hirokazu Hasegawa,et al.  Directed self-assembly of block copolymers , 2013 .

[11]  Craig J. Hawker,et al.  Interfacial Segregation in Disordered Block Copolymers: Effect of Tunable Surface Potentials , 1997 .

[12]  Mark Neisser,et al.  Implementation of a chemo-epitaxy flow for directed self-assembly on 300-mm wafer processing equipment , 2012 .

[13]  Roel Gronheid,et al.  Towards an all-track 300 mm process for directed self-assembly , 2011 .

[14]  William D. Hinsberg,et al.  Self-assembly patterning for sub-15nm half-pitch: a transition from lab to fab , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Juan J. de Pablo,et al.  Chemical Patterns for Directed Self-Assembly of Lamellae-Forming Block Copolymers with Density Multiplication of Features , 2013 .