The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:3078–3094
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Austin,et al. The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data , 2005, Statistics in medicine.
[2] Peter C Austin,et al. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study , 2007, Statistics in medicine.
[3] S Greenland,et al. Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.
[4] Peter C Austin,et al. A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 , 2008, Statistics in medicine.
[5] James Stafford,et al. The Performance of Two Data-Generation Processes for Data with Specified Marginal Treatment Odds Ratios , 2008, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..
[6] Peter C Austin,et al. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study , 2007, Statistics in medicine.
[7] Peter C Austin,et al. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[8] Peter C Austin,et al. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case‐study estimating the effectiveness of post‐AMI statin use , 2006, Statistics in medicine.
[9] D. Rubin,et al. Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .
[10] D. Rubin,et al. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .