Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods

BackgroundGenomic selection has become a very important tool in animal genetics and is rapidly emerging in plant genetics. It holds the promise to be particularly beneficial to select for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure, such as traits that are measured in one environment and selected for in another environment. The objective of this paper was to develop three models that would permit multi-trait genomic selection by combining scarcely recorded traits with genetically correlated indicator traits, and to compare their performance to single-trait models, using simulated datasets.MethodsThree (SNP) Single Nucleotide Polymorphism based models were used. Model G and BCπ0 assumed that contributed (co)variances of all SNP are equal. Model BSSVS sampled SNP effects from a distribution with large (or small) effects to model SNP that are (or not) associated with a quantitative trait locus. For reasons of comparison, model A including pedigree but not SNP information was fitted as well.ResultsIn terms of accuracies for animals without phenotypes, the models generally ranked as follows: BSSVS > BCπ0 > G > > A. Using multi-trait SNP-based models, the accuracy for juvenile animals without any phenotypes increased up to 0.10. For animals with phenotypes on an indicator trait only, accuracy increased up to 0.03 and 0.14, for genetic correlations with the evaluated trait of 0.25 and 0.75, respectively.ConclusionsWhen the indicator trait had a genetic correlation lower than 0.5 with the trait of interest in our simulated data, the accuracy was higher if genotypes rather than phenotypes were obtained for the indicator trait. However, when genetic correlations were higher than 0.5, using an indicator trait led to higher accuracies for selection candidates. For different combinations of traits, the level of genetic correlation below which genotyping selection candidates is more effective than obtaining phenotypes for an indicator trait, needs to be derived considering at least the heritabilities and the numbers of animals recorded for the traits involved.

[1]  Naomi R. Wray,et al.  Estimating Effects and Making Predictions from Genome-Wide Marker Data , 2010, 1010.4710.

[2]  M P L Calus,et al.  Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[3]  R. L. Quaas,et al.  Multiple Trait Evaluation Using Relatives' Records , 1976 .

[4]  Peter M Visscher,et al.  Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. , 2007, Genome research.

[5]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Fine mapping of multiple QTL using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping – A comparison of single QTL and multi QTL methods , 2007, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[6]  Rohan L. Fernando,et al.  Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  Sang Hong Lee,et al.  Predicting Unobserved Phenotypes for Complex Traits from Whole-Genome SNP Data , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[9]  C. Schrooten,et al.  Effects of the number of markers per haplotype and clustering of haplotypes on the accuracy of QTL mapping and prediction of genomic breeding values , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[10]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations , 1968, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  K. Gardner,et al.  Shared quantitative trait loci underlying the genetic correlation between continuous traits , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[12]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference. , 1996 .

[13]  A. Verbyla,et al.  Genetics Selection Evolution , 2009 .

[14]  Multitrait quantitative trait Loci mapping for milk production traits in danish Holstein cattle. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  Georgios Banos,et al.  Dependent Variables in International Sire Evaluations , 1995 .

[16]  Nengjun Yi,et al.  Stochastic search variable selection for identifying multiple quantitative trait loci. , 2003, Genetics.

[17]  B. Guldbrandtsen,et al.  Multitrait fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using combined linkage disequilibria and linkage analysis. , 2003, Genetics.

[18]  R. Fernando,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values , 2007, Genetics.

[19]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. , 2010, Briefings in functional genomics.

[20]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[21]  M. Goddard,et al.  Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data , 2004, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[22]  Michael E Goddard,et al.  Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. , 2009, Genetics research.

[23]  Paul M VanRaden,et al.  International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[24]  Raphael Mrode,et al.  Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values , 1996 .

[25]  C. Schrooten,et al.  Improving genomic prediction by EuroGenomics collaboration. , 2010 .

[26]  H. Piepho,et al.  Multi-trait association mapping in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) , 2008, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[27]  I Misztal,et al.  Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[29]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  Robin Thompson,et al.  ASREML user guide release 1.0 , 2002 .

[31]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  M. Calus,et al.  Accuracy of Genomic Selection Using Different Methods to Define Haplotypes , 2008, Genetics.